Literature DB >> 19275320

Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities.

Mathias Dietz1, Stephan D Ewert, Volker Hohmann.   

Abstract

Psychoacoustic experiments were conducted to investigate the role and interaction of fine-structure and envelope-based interaural temporal disparities. A computational model for the lateralization of binaural stimuli, motivated by recent physiological findings, is suggested and evaluated against the psychoacoustic data. The model is based on the independent extraction of the interaural phase difference (IPD) from the stimulus fine-structure and envelope. Sinusoidally amplitude-modulated 1-kHz tones were used in the experiments. The lateralization from either carrier (fine-structure) or modulator (envelope) IPD was matched with an interaural level difference, revealing a nearly linear dependence for both IPD types up to 135 degrees , independent of the modulation frequency. However, if a carrier IPD was traded with an opposed modulator IPD to produce a centered sound image, a carrier IPD of 45 degrees required the largest opposed modulator IPD. The data could be modeled assuming a population of binaural neurons with a physiological distribution of the best IPDs clustered around 45 degrees -50 degrees . The model was also used to predict the perceived lateralization of previously published data. Subject-dependent differences in the perceptual salience of fine-structure and envelope cues, also reported previously, could be modeled by individual weighting coefficients for the two cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275320     DOI: 10.1121/1.3076045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Katharina Kaiser; Lavinia Kernschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds II: single-neuron recordings.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Torsten Marquardt; Annette Stange; Michael Pecka; Benedikt Grothe; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The fMRI Data of Thompson et al. (2006) Do Not Constrain How the Human Midbrain Represents Interaural Time Delay.

Authors:  Richard M Stern; H Steven Colburn; Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences: Modeling Auditory Modulation Filtering.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jimena A Ballestero; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Interaction of interaural cues and their contribution to the lateralisation of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Sandra Tolnai; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Effects of age on sensitivity to interaural time differences in envelope and fine structure, individually and in combination.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael G Heinz; Louis D Braida; Agnès C Léger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Heath Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Auditory Model-Based Sound Direction Estimation With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Daryl Kelvasa; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.