Literature DB >> 17297822

Why do transposed stimuli enhance binaural processing?: Interaural envelope correlation vs envelope normalized fourth moment.

Leslie R Bernstein, Constantine Trahiotis.   

Abstract

High-frequency, "transposed" stimuli have been shown to yield enhanced processing of ongoing interaural temporal disparities (ITDs). This paper concerns determining which aspect or aspects of the envelopes of such stimuli mediate enhanced resolution of ITD. Behavioral measures and quantitative analyses utilizing special classes of transposed stimuli show that the "internal" interaural envelope correlation accounts both qualitatively and quantitatively for the enhancement. In contrast, the normalized fourth moment of the envelope (Y), which provides an index of the degree to which the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli fluctuate, does not lead to a successful accounting of the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297822     DOI: 10.1121/1.2401225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Katharina Kaiser; Lavinia Kernschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Accounting quantitatively for sensitivity to envelope-based interaural temporal disparities at high frequencies.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Neural coding of echo-envelope disparities in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Frank Borina; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Interaural coherence for noise bands: waveforms and envelopes.

Authors:  Neil L Aaronson; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

8.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.