Literature DB >> 25744055

Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement.

Jeremy S Eagles1, Anthony N Carlsen, Colum D MacKinnon.   

Abstract

Movements that are executed or imagined activate a similar subset of cortical regions, but the extent to which this activity represents functionally equivalent neural processes is unclear. During preparation for an executed movement, presentation of a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) evokes a premature release of the planned movement with the spatial and temporal features of the tasks essentially intact. If imagined movement incorporates the same preparatory processes as executed movement, then a SAS should release the planned movement during preparation. This hypothesis was tested using an instructed-delay cueing paradigm during which subjects were required to rapidly release a handheld weight while maintaining the posture of the arm or to perform first-person imagery of the same task while holding the weight. In a subset of trials, a SAS was presented at 1500, 500, or 200 ms prior to the release cue. Task-appropriate preparation during executed and imagined movements was confirmed by electroencephalographic recording of a contingent negative variation waveform. During preparation for executed movement, a SAS often resulted in premature release of the weight with the probability of release progressively increasing from 24 % at -1500 ms to 80 % at -200 ms. In contrast, the SAS rarely (<2 % of trials) triggered a release of the weight during imagined movement. However, the SAS frequently evoked the planned postural response (suppression of bicep brachii muscle activity) irrespective of the task or timing of stimulation (even during periods of postural hold without preparation). These findings provide evidence that neural processes mediating the preparation and release of the focal motor task (release of the weight) are markedly attenuated or absent during imagined movement and that postural and focal components of the task are prepared independently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25744055      PMCID: PMC4857718          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4237-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  70 in total

1.  Movement-related potentials associated with self-paced, cued and imagined arm movements.

Authors:  S K Jankelowitz; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Equivalent is not equal: primary motor cortex (MI) activation during motor imagery and execution of sequential movements.

Authors:  M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña; S Galdo-Alvarez; C Lastra-Barreira
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Postural preparation prior to stepping in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mark W Rogers; Robert Kennedy; Sonia Palmer; Monika Pawar; Maggie Reising; Katherine M Martinez; Tanya Simuni; Yunhui Zhang; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Short time sports exercise boosts motor imagery patterns: implications of mental practice in rehabilitation programs.

Authors:  Selina C Wriessnegger; David Steyrl; Karl Koschutnig; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Mental representation and mental practice: experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery.

Authors:  Cornelia Frank; William M Land; Carmen Popp; Thomas Schack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.