Literature DB >> 22124033

Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Erik H Hoyer1, Pablo A Celnik.   

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability. Understanding how people recover from stroke and other brain lesions remain one of the biggest conundrums in neuroscience. As a result, concerted efforts in recent years have focused on investigating the neurophysiological changes that occur in the brain after stroke, and in developing novel strategies to enhance motor recovery. In particular, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive tool that has been used to investigate the brain plasticity changes resulting from stroke and as a therapeutic modality to safely improve motor function. In this review, we discuss the contributions of TMS to understand how different motor areas, such as the ipsilesional hemisphere, secondary motor areas, and contralesional hemisphere are involved in motor recovery. We also consider recent studies using repetitive TMS (rTMS) in stroke patients to enhance upper extremity function. Although further studies are needed, these investigations provide an important starting point to understand the stimulation parameters and patient characteristics that may influence the optimal response to non-invasive brain stimulation. Future directions of rTMS are discussed in the context of post-stroke motor recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124033      PMCID: PMC3613277          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  139 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation.

Authors:  Valerie M Pomeroy; Geoffrey Cloud; Raymond C Tallis; Catherine Donaldson; Veena Nayak; Simon Miller
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Electrophysiological transcortical diaschisis after cortical photothrombosis in rat brain.

Authors:  I Buchkremer-Ratzmann; M August; G Hagemann; O W Witte
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke.

Authors:  P M Rossini; C Altamura; F Ferreri; J-M Melgari; F Tecchio; M Tombini; P Pasqualetti; F Vernieri
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2007-06

4.  Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.

Authors:  R J Nudo; B M Wise; F SiFuentes; G W Milliken
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; A Pascual-Leone; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke.

Authors:  A Turton; S Wroe; N Trepte; C Fraser; R N Lemon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08

7.  Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Pablo Celnik; Friedhelm Hummel; Michelle Harris-Love; Rebecca Wolk; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Malcolm; William J Triggs; Kathye E Light; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi; Sam Wu; Kimberly Reid; Stephen E Nadeau
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Functionally specific reorganization in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Danielle Trief; Silke Göbel; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Cerebellar transcranial static magnetic field stimulation transiently reduces cerebellar brain inhibition.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Y Okada
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2017 Apr/Jun

3.  Can cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation become a valuable neurorehabilitation intervention?

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 4.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Lisa R Sun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Therapeutic Application of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Rehabilitative Training for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.

Authors:  Shin Sato; Wataru Kakuda; Mitsuhiro Sano; Takamasa Kitahara; Risa Kiko
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-06-30

6.  Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  R J Morecraft; J Ge; K S Stilwell-Morecraft; D W McNeal; S M Hynes; M A Pizzimenti; D L Rotella; W G Darling
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Strategies to augment recovery after stroke.

Authors:  François Chollet; Jean-François Albucher
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Tailoring Brain Stimulation to the Nature of Rehabilitative Therapies in Stroke: A Conceptual Framework Based on their Unique Mechanisms of Recovery.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Jayme S Knutson; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-operative neurorehabilitation in neuro-oncology: a review of the literature and future directions.

Authors:  Evan H Einstein; Nicholas B Dadario; Hamza Khilji; Justin W Silverstein; Michael E Sughrue; Randy S D'Amico
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Central Nervous System Plasticity Influences Language and Cognitive Recovery in Adult Glioma.

Authors:  Saritha Krishna; Sofia Kakaizada; Nyle Almeida; David Brang; Shawn Hervey-Jumper
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.