Literature DB >> 28676140

Cerebellar transcranial static magnetic field stimulation transiently reduces cerebellar brain inhibition.

Akiyoshi Matsugi, Y Okada.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) delivered using a compact cylindrical NdFeB magnet over the cerebellum modulates the excitability of the cerebellum and contralateral primary motor cortex, as measured using cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and resting motor threshold (rMT). These parameters were measured before tSMS or sham stimulation and immediately, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after stimulation. There were no significant changes in CBI, MEPs or rMT over time in the sham stimulation condition, and no changes in MEPs or rMT in the tSMS condition. However, CBI was significantly decreased immediately after tSMS as compared to that before and 5 minutes after tSMS. Our results suggest that tSMS delivered to the cerebellar hemisphere transiently reduces cerebellar inhibitory output but does not affect the excitability of the contralateral motor cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28676140      PMCID: PMC5507156          DOI: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.2.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Neurol        ISSN: 0393-5264


  40 in total

1.  Effect of a 0.5-T static magnetic field on conduction in guinea pig spinal cord.

Authors:  Abigail Coots; Riyi Shi; Arthur D Rosen
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Mark Hallett; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kenichi Horino; Atsuko Yagura; Akiyoshi Matsugi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on triphasic electromyographic pattern.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kyoji Sugiyama; Kazuo Abe
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Antonio Oliviero; Laura Mordillo-Mateos; Pablo Arias; Ivan Panyavin; Guglielmo Foffani; Juan Aguilar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Ataxic hemiparesis: neurophysiological analysis by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Saeko Kikuchi; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Arata Moriya; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Koichiro Nakamura; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cerebellar magnetic stimulation decreases levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  G Koch; L Brusa; F Carrillo; E Lo Gerfo; S Torriero; M Oliveri; P Mir; C Caltagirone; P Stanzione
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  John E Schlerf; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after stroke.

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Máximo Zimerman; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Static magnetic stimulation in the central nervous system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nuria Viudes-Sarrion; Enrique Velasco; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Carmen Lillo-Navarro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.830

2.  Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation facilitates excitability of spinal reflex, but does not affect cerebellar inhibition and facilitation in spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Yutaka Kikuchi; Kenta Kaneko; Yuta Seko; Masato Odagaki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Children.

Authors:  Asha Hollis; Ephrem Zewdie; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Alicia Hilderley; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Helen L Carlson; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reduces the Silent Period on Hand Muscle Electromyography During Force Control.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Shinya Douchi; Kodai Suzuki; Kosuke Oku; Nobuhiko Mori; Hiroaki Tanaka; Satoru Nishishita; Kyota Bando; Yutaka Kikuchi; Yohei Okada
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-01-24

5.  Exploring the role of the left DLPFC in fatigue during unresisted rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Aranza Vila-Villar; Mariña Naya-Fernández; Antonio Madrid; Elena Madinabeitia-Mancebo; Verónica Robles-García; Javier Cudeiro; Pablo Arias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Shinya Douchi; Rikiya Hasada; Nobuhiko Mori; Yohei Okada; Naoki Yoshida; Satoru Nishishita; Koichi Hosomi; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.