Literature DB >> 30737601

Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

María Antonia Fuentes Calderón1, Ainhoa Navarro Miralles2, Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta3, Jesús María Gonçalves Estella3, María José Sánchez Ledesma4,5.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation is one of the non-invasive techniques whose main mechanism of action is based on its modulation of cortical excitability. The objective of this study is to analyze the variables (i.e, demographics, clinicals, stimulation parameters) that could influence into the responses during rehabilitation of the upper extremity in patients with stroke. Our systematic review has been performed by searching full-text articles published from January 2008 to December 2018 in Embase, Medline, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Studies with adult patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at any stage of evolution were included. We compared interventions with any type of transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal, cathodal or bihemispheric, also known as dual) regarding improvement of upper extremity motor function. We included 14 studies with 368 patients, of whom almost 89% have ischemic etiology and more than half are males. Most patients were considered subacute or chronic, while only two studies were selected with patients in the acute phase. Different methods of using transcranial direct current stimulation with several complementary therapies were identified, such as virtual reality, robot therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy, Constraint Induced Movement Therapy or Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. In conclusion, there is not significant evidence due to heterogeneity of clinical data and therapies. Clinical studies with greater number of participants and protocols standardized could outline this assessment in future studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rehabilitation; Stroke; Systematic review; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30737601     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  65 in total

1.  Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.

Authors:  H D Clark; G A Wells; C Huët; F A McAlister; L R Salmi; D Fergusson; A Laupacis
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esther M J Steultjens; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Jos C M van de Nes; Edith H C Cup; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies.

Authors:  Nestor A Bayona; Jamie Bitensky; Katherine Salter; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 4.  The constraint induced movement therapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the adult stroke patients.

Authors:  D Bonaiuti; L Rebasti; P Sioli
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2007-05-28

5.  The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search.

Authors:  Cristina Mamédio da Costa Santos; Cibele Andrucioli de Mattos Pimenta; Moacyr Roberto Cuce Nobre
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2007 May-Jun

6.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  J H Van der Lee; V De Groot; H Beckerman; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Peter R Smale; James P Coxon; Melanie K Fleming; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients.

Authors:  David Tombari; Isabelle Loubinoux; Jérémie Pariente; Angelique Gerdelat; Jean-François Albucher; Jean Tardy; Emmanuelle Cassol; François Chollet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Cynthia J Danells; Sandra E Black
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Toby J Gill; Sandra G Brauer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 3.033

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study.

Authors:  I-Ju Kuo; Chih-Wei Tang; Yun-An Tsai; Shuen-Chang Tang; Chun-Jen Lin; Shih-Pin Hsu; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chi-Hung Juan; Catharina Zich; Charlotte J Stagg; I-Hui Lee
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with trunk-targeted, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jaya Shanker Tedla; Erika Rodrigues; Arthur S Ferreira; Jose Vicente; Ravi Shankar Reddy; Kumar Gular; Devika Rani Sangadala; Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi; Faisal Asiri; Ajaya Kumar Midde; Snehil Dixit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.061

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.