Literature DB >> 22118602

Precision and accuracy of point-of-care testing coagulometers used for self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy.

T D Christensen1, T B Larsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy is monitored by the use of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Patients who perform self-testing or self-management use a point-of-care testing (POCT) coagulometer (INR monitor) to estimate their INRs. A precondition for a correct dosage of coumarins is a correct INR estimation, and the method and apparatus used for providing the INR measurements are crucial in this context. Several studies have been published regarding the precision and accuracy of these POCT coagulometers, and have led to diverse conclusions. It is difficult and challenging to perform an overview of the literature, owing to the vast amount of papers, with differences in design, statistical analysis, etc.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature, especially regarding the precision and accuracy of the POCT coagulometers, to provide recommendations for clinical use and quality control, and to point out areas for future research.
METHODS: We included a total of 22 studies, of which four were characterized as high-quality studies.
RESULTS: The precision of the POCT coagulometers was generally adequate for clinical use. Their performance in terms of accuracy has to be viewed in the context of the inherent inaccuracies of INR measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of POCT coagulometers seems, in this respect, to be generally acceptable, and they can be used in a clinical setting.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22118602     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  18 in total

1.  Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson; Jane Wolstenholme; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A droplet-based microfluidic viscometer for the measurement of blood coagulation.

Authors:  Sarah E Mena; Yunzi Li; Joseph McCormick; Brendan McCracken; Carmen Colmenero; Kevin Ward; Mark A Burns
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Is self-monitoring an effective option for people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy? A systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Pawana Sharma; Graham Scotland; Moira Cruickshank; Emma Tassie; Cynthia Fraser; Christopher Burton; Bernard Croal; Craig R Ramsay; Miriam Brazzelli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Measurement of non-VKA oral anticoagulants versus classic ones: the appropriate use of hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Anne Tamigniau; Bernard Chatelain; Catherine Goffinet; Jean-Michel Dogné; François Mullier
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-04

6.  Point-of-care coagulometry in prehospital emergency patients--are international normalized ratios useful?

Authors:  Manuel F Struck; Peter Hilbert-Carius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Role of POC INR in the early stage of diagnosis of coagulopathy.

Authors:  Florian J Raimann; Marie-Louise Lindner; Christoph Martin; Lukas Jennewein; Thomas Lustenberger; Florian Piekarski; Kai Zacharowski; Christian F Weber
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-05-23

8.  Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers.

Authors:  Mina Hur; Hanah Kim; Chul Min Park; Antonio La Gioia; Sang-Gyu Choi; Ju-Hee Choi; Hee-Won Moon; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in everyday practice: efficacy and safety in a nationwide long-term prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Nagler; Lucas M Bachmann; Pirmin Schmid; Pascale Raddatz Müller; Walter A Wuillemin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The clinical impact of different coagulometers on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jan Leendert Pouwel Brouwer; Hugo Stoevelaar; Christoph Sucker
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.