Literature DB >> 22114240

Magnetization transfer contrast-prepared MR imaging of the liver: inability to distinguish healthy from cirrhotic liver.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Pippa Storey, Anthony G Gilet, Benjamin E Niver, James S Babb, Cristina H Hajdu, Vivian S Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of magnetization transfer (MT) contrast-prepared magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to help distinguish healthy from cirrhotic liver by using a spectrum of MT pulse frequency offsets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant prospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. After optimization of the MT sequence by using agar phantoms with protein concentrations ranging from 0% to 4%, 20 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension and 20 healthy volunteers with no known liver disease underwent liver MR imaging that included eight separate breath-hold MT contrast sequences, each performed by using a different MT pulse frequency offset (range, 200-2500 Hz). Regions of interest were then placed to calculate the MT ratio for the liver, fat, and muscle in the volunteer group and for the liver in the cirrhosis group.
RESULTS: MT ratio increased with decreasing MT pulse frequency offset for each of the four phantoms and the assessed in vivo tissues, consistent with previous reports. At all frequency offsets, MT ratio increased with increasing phantom protein concentration. In volunteers, at frequency offsets greater than 400 Hz, the MT ratio was significantly greater for muscle (range, 34.4%-54.9%) and significantly lower for subcutaneous fat (range, 10.3%-12.6%), compared with that for the liver (range, 22.8%-46.9%; P < .001 all comparisons). However, the MT ratio was nearly identical between healthy (range, 26.0%-80.0%) and cirrhotic livers (range, 26.7%-81.2%) for all frequency offsets (P = .162-.737), aside from a minimal difference in MT ratio of 1.7% at a frequency offset of 2500 Hz (22.8% in healthy liver vs 24.5% in cirrhotic liver) that was not significant when the Bonferroni correction was applied (P = .015).
CONCLUSION: Findings of this study confirm the ability of the MT contrast-prepared sequence to help distinguish substances of varying protein concentration and suggest that MT imaging is unlikely to be of clinical utility in differentiating healthy and cirrhotic livers. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22114240     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

2.  Magnetization transfer in lamellar liquid crystals.

Authors:  Dariya I Malyarenko; Ellen M Zimmermann; Jeremy Adler; Scott D Swanson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetization transfer imaging of normal and abnormal testis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Alexandra Ntorkou; Dimitrios Baltogiannis; Anastasios Sylakos; Sotirios Stavrou; Loukas G Astrakas; Vasilios Maliakas; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Maria I Argyropoulou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Chemical Shift magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Xifu Wang; Frank H Miller; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Respiratory self-gating for free-breathing magnetization transfer MRI of the abdomen.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Zhuoli Zhang; Kangan Li; Ning Jin; Yue Zhang; Tianjing Zhang; Frank H Miller; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography noninvasively detects in vivo renal medullary fibrosis secondary to swine renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Michael J Korsmo; Behzad Ebrahimi; Alfonso Eirin; John R Woollard; James D Krier; John A Crane; Lizette Warner; Kevin Glaser; Roger Grimm; Richard L Ehman; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping of the human liver in vivo for quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh; Erica V Tartaglione; George N Ioannou
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Recent advances in molecular magnetic resonance imaging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Zhiming Li; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Other Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Chronic Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.