OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can noninvasively sample tissue stiffness in vivo. Renal fibrosis secondary to renal artery stenosis (RAS), which is aggravated in atherosclerotic RAS (ARAS), may increase its stiffness. An increase in cortical stiffness in vivo can be masked by intrinsic hemodynamic determinants, whereas renal medullary stiffness is less dependent on renal hemodynamics. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that MRE-determined medullary stiffness would correspond to the histological degree of medullary fibrosis in stenotic kidneys in RAS and detect its exacerbation in ARAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen pigs were studied 10 weeks after induction of unilateral RAS (n = 6), ARAS (n = 5), or sham (n = 6). Stiffness of the cortex and the medulla was determined through 3-dimensional MRE, and renal perfusion and function were determined using multidetector computed tomography. Kidney fibrosis was subsequently assessed ex vivo using the Masson trichrome staining. RESULTS: Renal stenotic cortex and medulla were significantly more fibrotic in RAS and ARAS compared with healthy kidney. However, MRE detected increased stiffness in RAS compared with the healthy kidney (12.7 ± 0.41 kPa vs 10.7 ± 0.18 kPa; P = 0.004) only in the medulla, which was further increased in ARAS (16.6 ± 1.3 kPa; P = 0.017 vs RAS). Magnetic resonance elastography-derived medullary, but not cortical, stiffness significantly correlated with histological degree of fibrosis, although cortical and medullary fibroses were correlated. Renal blood flow and function were similarly decreased in RAS and ARAS compared with the healthy kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive 3-dimensional MRE detects increased renal medullary stiffness in RAS and ARAS in vivo, which correlates with its fibrosis ex vivo and may also reflect cortical fibrosis. Hence, MRE-derived medullary stiffness can be potentially useful in detecting renal fibrosis and track disease progression.
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can noninvasively sample tissue stiffness in vivo. Renal fibrosis secondary to renal artery stenosis (RAS), which is aggravated in atherosclerotic RAS (ARAS), may increase its stiffness. An increase in cortical stiffness in vivo can be masked by intrinsic hemodynamic determinants, whereas renal medullary stiffness is less dependent on renal hemodynamics. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that MRE-determined medullary stiffness would correspond to the histological degree of medullary fibrosis in stenotic kidneys in RAS and detect its exacerbation in ARAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen pigs were studied 10 weeks after induction of unilateral RAS (n = 6), ARAS (n = 5), or sham (n = 6). Stiffness of the cortex and the medulla was determined through 3-dimensional MRE, and renal perfusion and function were determined using multidetector computed tomography. Kidney fibrosis was subsequently assessed ex vivo using the Masson trichrome staining. RESULTS:Renal stenotic cortex and medulla were significantly more fibrotic in RAS and ARAS compared with healthy kidney. However, MRE detected increased stiffness in RAS compared with the healthy kidney (12.7 ± 0.41 kPa vs 10.7 ± 0.18 kPa; P = 0.004) only in the medulla, which was further increased in ARAS (16.6 ± 1.3 kPa; P = 0.017 vs RAS). Magnetic resonance elastography-derived medullary, but not cortical, stiffness significantly correlated with histological degree of fibrosis, although cortical and medullary fibroses were correlated. Renal blood flow and function were similarly decreased in RAS and ARAS compared with the healthy kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive 3-dimensional MRE detects increased renal medullary stiffness in RAS and ARAS in vivo, which correlates with its fibrosis ex vivo and may also reflect cortical fibrosis. Hence, MRE-derived medullary stiffness can be potentially useful in detecting renal fibrosis and track disease progression.
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Pippa Storey; Anthony G Gilet; Benjamin E Niver; James S Babb; Cristina H Hajdu; Vivian S Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alfonso Eirin; Xiang-Yang Zhu; James D Krier; Hui Tang; Kyra L Jordan; Joseph P Grande; Amir Lerman; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Victor H Urbieta-Caceres; Ronit Lavi; Xiang-Yang Zhu; John A Crane; Stephen C Textor; Amir Lerman; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2010-05-12
Authors: Lizette Warner; Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; John A Woollard; Carolina A Carrascal; Michael J Korsmo; John A Crane; Richard L Ehman; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Feng Wang; Daisuke Katagiri; Ke Li; Keiko Takahashi; Suwan Wang; Shinya Nagasaka; Hua Li; C Chad Quarles; Ming-Zhi Zhang; Akira Shimizu; John C Gore; Raymond C Harris; Takamune Takahashi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David P Basile; Joseph V Bonventre; Ravindra Mehta; Masaomi Nangaku; Robert Unwin; Mitchell H Rosner; John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Behzad Ebrahimi; Hui Tang; Timothy L Kline; Tyson A Burningham; Prassana K Mishra; Joseph P Grande; Slobodan I Macura; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Anish Kirpalani; Eyesha Hashim; General Leung; Jin K Kim; Adriana Krizova; Serge Jothy; Maya Deeb; Nan N Jiang; Lauren Glick; Gevork Mnatzakanian; Darren A Yuen Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 8.237