Literature DB >> 22112650

A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Yunlong Huo1, Mark Svendsen, Jenny Susana Choy, Z-D Zhang, Ghassan S Kassab.   

Abstract

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR), an important index of coronary stenosis, is measured by a pressure sensor guidewire. The determination of FFR, only based on the dimensions (lumen diameters and length) of stenosis and hyperaemic coronary flow with no other ad hoc parameters, is currently not possible. We propose an analytical model derived from conservation of energy, which considers various energy losses along the length of a stenosis, i.e. convective and diffusive energy losses as well as energy loss due to sudden constriction and expansion in lumen area. In vitro (constrictions were created in isolated arteries using symmetric and asymmetric tubes as well as an inflatable occluder cuff) and in vivo (constrictions were induced in coronary arteries of eight swine by an occluder cuff) experiments were used to validate the proposed analytical model. The proposed model agreed well with the experimental measurements. A least-squares fit showed a linear relation as (Δp or FFR)(experiment) = a(Δp or FFR)(theory) + b, where a and b were 1.08 and -1.15 mmHg (r(2) = 0.99) for in vitro Δp, 0.96 and 1.79 mmHg (r(2) = 0.75) for in vivo Δp, and 0.85 and 0.1 (r(2) = 0.7) for FFR. Flow pulsatility and stenosis shape (e.g. eccentricity, exit angle divergence, etc.) had a negligible effect on myocardial FFR, while the entrance effect in a coronary stenosis was found to contribute significantly to the pressure drop. We present a physics-based experimentally validated analytical model of coronary stenosis, which allows prediction of FFR based on stenosis dimensions and hyperaemic coronary flow with no empirical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112650      PMCID: PMC3350723          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  32 in total

Review 1.  A definition of the intima of human arteries and of its atherosclerosis-prone regions. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association.

Authors:  H C Stary; D H Blankenhorn; A B Chandler; S Glagov; W Insull; M Richardson; M E Rosenfeld; S A Schaffer; C J Schwartz; W D Wagner
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb       Date:  1992-01

Review 2.  Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation.

Authors:  J I Hoffman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Effect of geometry on pressure losses across models of arterial stenoses.

Authors:  B D Seeley; D F Young
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Hemodynamics of arterial stenoses at elevated flow rates.

Authors:  D F Young; N R Cholvin; R L Kirkeeide; A C Roth
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses. I. Steady flow.

Authors:  D F Young; F Y Tsai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Dynamic coronary stenosis.

Authors:  K L Gould
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Effect of stenotic dimensions and blood flow on the hemodynamic significance of model coronary arterial stenoses.

Authors:  K Lipscomb; S Hooten
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Analysis of shear stress and hemodynamic factors in a model of coronary artery stenosis and thrombosis.

Authors:  J Strony; A Beaudoin; D Brands; B Adelman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-11

9.  Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  N H Pijls; J A van Son; R L Kirkeeide; B De Bruyne; K L Gould
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Regional volumetric coronary blood flow measurement by digital angiography: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Yifang Zhou; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reduced order models for transstenotic pressure drop in the coronary arteries.

Authors:  Mehran Mirramezani; Scott Diamond; Harold Litt; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Effect of stenosis eccentricity on the functionality of coronary bifurcation lesions-a numerical study.

Authors:  Catherine Pagiatakis; Jean-Claude Tardif; Philippe L L'Allier; Rosaire Mongrain
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Travis Johnson; Huanjun Ding; Jerry Lipinski
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Real time reduced order model for angiography fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Javad Hashemi; Bhavesh Patel; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Computed tomography-based diagnosis of diffuse compensatory enlargement of coronary arteries using scaling power laws.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Jenny Susana Choy; Thomas Wischgoll; Tong Luo; Shawn D Teague; Deepak L Bhatt; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A phantom based evaluation of vessel lumen area quantification for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Travis Johnson; Jerry Lipinski; Huanjun Ding; Logan Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis Using Blood Residence Time.

Authors:  Javad Hashemi; Bhavesh Patel; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Yubing Shi; Israel Valverde; Patricia V Lawford; Heynric B Grotenhuis; Philipp Beerbaum; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.560

9.  Accurate Calculation of FFR Based on a Physics-Driven Fluid-Structure Interaction Model.

Authors:  Xiaolu Xi; Jincheng Liu; Hao Sun; Ke Xu; Xue Wang; Liyuan Zhang; Tianming Du; Jian Liu; Bao Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Mild anastomotic stenosis in patient-specific CABG model may enhance graft patency: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Tong Luo; Julius M Guccione; Shawn D Teague; Wenchang Tan; José A Navia; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.