Literature DB >> 22112061

Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)): best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases.

Michael S Marshall1, Lori A Burns, C David Sherrill.   

Abstract

In benchmark-quality studies of non-covalent interactions, it is common to estimate interaction energies at the complete basis set (CBS) coupled-cluster through perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level of theory by adding to CBS second-order perturbation theory (MP2) a "coupled-cluster correction," δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)), evaluated in a modest basis set. This work illustrates that commonly used basis sets such as 6-31G*(0.25) can yield large, even wrongly signed, errors for δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)) that vary significantly by binding motif. Double-ζ basis sets show more reliable results when used with explicitly correlated methods to form a δ(MP2-F12)(CCSD(T(*))-F12) correction, yielding a mean absolute deviation of 0.11 kcal mol(-1) for the S22 test set. Examining the coupled-cluster correction for basis sets up to sextuple-ζ in quality reveals that δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)) converges monotonically only beyond a turning point at triple-ζ or quadruple-ζ quality. In consequence, CBS extrapolation of δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)) corrections before the turning point, generally CBS (aug-cc-pVDZ,aug-cc-pVTZ), are found to be unreliable and often inferior to aug-cc-pVTZ alone, especially for hydrogen-bonding systems. Using the findings of this paper, we revise some recent benchmarks for non-covalent interactions, namely the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG test sets. The maximum differences in the revised benchmarks are 0.080, 0.060, 0.257, and 0.102 kcal mol(-1), respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112061     DOI: 10.1063/1.3659142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  22 in total

1.  Fast, accurate evaluation of exact exchange: The occ-RI-K algorithm.

Authors:  Samuel Manzer; Paul R Horn; Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Survival of the most transferable at the top of Jacob's ladder: Defining and testing the ωB97M(2) double hybrid density functional.

Authors:  Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Comparison of some dispersion-corrected and traditional functionals with CCSD(T) and MP2 ab initio methods: dispersion, induction, and basis set superposition error.

Authors:  Dipankar Roy; Mateusz Marianski; Neepa T Maitra; J J Dannenberg
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Improved parameterization of interatomic potentials for rare gas dimers with density-based energy decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Nengjie Zhou; Zhenyu Lu; Qin Wu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Tomáš Kubař; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  An Efficient Method to Evaluate Intermolecular Interaction Energies in Large Systems Using Overlapping Multicenter ONIOM and the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.

Authors:  Naoya Asada; Dmitri G Fedorov; Kazuo Kitaura; Isao Nakanishi; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.475

7.  The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Lori A Burns; John C Faver; Zheng Zheng; Michael S Marshall; Daniel G A Smith; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell; Kenneth M Merz; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Intermolecular interactions in the condensed phase: Evaluation of semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Jimmy C Kromann; Jan H Jensen; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  A reinvestigation of the dimer of para-benzoquinone and pyrimidine with MP2, CCSD(T), and DFT using functionals including those designed to describe dispersion.

Authors:  Mateusz Marianski; Antoni Oliva; J J Dannenberg
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Impact of geometry optimization on base-base stacking interaction energies in the canonical A- and B-forms of DNA.

Authors:  Ashley Ringer McDonald; Elizabeth J Denning; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.