Literature DB >> 23343365

Impact of geometry optimization on base-base stacking interaction energies in the canonical A- and B-forms of DNA.

Ashley Ringer McDonald1, Elizabeth J Denning, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Base stacking is known to make an important contribution to the stability of DNA and RNA, and accordingly, significant efforts are ongoing to calculate stacking energies using ab initio quantum mechanical methods. To date, impressive improvements have been made in the model chemistries used to perform stacking energy calculations, including extensions that include robust treatments of electron correlation with extended basis sets, as required to treat interactions where dispersion makes a significant contribution. However, those efforts typically use rigid monomer geometries when calculating the interaction energies. To overcome this, in the present work, we describe a novel internal coordinate definition that allows the relative, intermolecular orientation of stacked base monomers to be constrained during geometry optimizations while allowing full optimization of the intramolecular degrees of freedom. Use of the novel reference frame to calculate the impact of full geometry optimization versus constraining the bases to be planar on base monomer stacking energies, combined with density-fitted, spin-component scaling MP2 treatment of electron correlation, shows that full optimization makes the average stacking energy more favorable by -3.4 and -1.5 kcal/mol for the canonical A and B conformations of the 16 5' to 3' base stacked monomers. Thus, treatment of geometry optimization impacts the stacking energies to an extent similar to or greater than the impact of current state of the art increases in the rigor of the model chemistry itself used to treat base stacking. Results also indicate that stacking favors the B-form of DNA, though the average difference versus the A-form decreases from -2.6 to -0.6 kcal/mol when the intramolecular geometry is allowed to fully relax. However, stacking involving cytosine is shown to favor the A-form of DNA, with that contribution generally larger in the fully optimized bases. The present results show the importance of allowing geometry optimization, as well as properly treating the appropriate model chemistry, in studies of nucleic acid base stacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343365      PMCID: PMC3579007          DOI: 10.1021/jp308364d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  43 in total

Review 1.  Overview of nucleic acid analysis programs.

Authors:  X J Lu; M S Babcock; W K Olson
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1999-02

2.  True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine...cytosine, adenine...thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment.

Authors:  Petr Jurecka; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Intrinsic conformational properties of deoxyribonucleosides: implicated role for cytosine in the equilibrium among the A, B, and Z forms of DNA.

Authors:  N Foloppe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A novel form of the DNA double helix imposed on the TATA-box by the TATA-binding protein.

Authors:  G Guzikevich-Guerstein; Z Shakked
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-01

6.  The anatomy of A-, B-, and Z-DNA.

Authors:  R E Dickerson; H R Drew; B N Conner; R M Wing; A V Fratini; M L Kopka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Sequence-dependence of the energetics of opening of at basepairs in DNA.

Authors:  Congju Chen; Irina M Russu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters.

Authors: 
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Web 3DNA--a web server for the analysis, reconstruction, and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic-acid structures.

Authors:  Guohui Zheng; Xiang-Jun Lu; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves+.

Authors:  R Lavery; M Moakher; J H Maddocks; D Petkeviciute; K Zakrzewska
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Polarizable force field for RNA based on the classical drude oscillator.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Polarizable Force Field for DNA Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator: I. Refinement Using Quantum Mechanical Base Stacking and Conformational Energetics.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Balancing the interactions of ions, water, and DNA in the Drude polarizable force field.

Authors:  Alexey Savelyev; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.991

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.