Literature DB >> 22106356

Rate of contrast material extravasations and allergic-like reactions: effect of extrinsic warming of low-osmolality iodinated CT contrast material to 37 degrees C.

Matthew S Davenport1, Carolyn L Wang, Mustafa R Bashir, Amy M Neville, Erik K Paulson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether extrinsic warming of the low-osmolality contrast material iopamidol to 37°C prior to intravenous administration at computed tomography (CT) affects extravasation and allergic-like reaction rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The need to obtain informed patient consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant and institutional review board-approved analysis. All adverse events related to the intravenous administration of iopamidol during CT examinations occurring 200 days before (period 1) and 200 days after (period 2) the cessation of extrinsic contrast material warming (37°C) for intravenous injections of less than 6 mL/sec at Duke University Medical Center (Durham, NC) were retrospectively reviewed. Adverse event rates were compared by using χ2 statistics.
RESULTS: There were 12,682 injections during period 1 (10,831 injections of iopamidol 300 and 1851 injections of iopamidol 370) and 12,138 injections (10, 064 injections of iopamidol 300 and 2074 injections of iopamidol 370) during period 2. Adverse event rates for iopamidol 300 were not affected by extrinsic warming (extravasation rates: 0.30% [32 of 10,831] in period 1 vs 0.23% [23 of 10,064] in period 2, P=.64; allergic-like reaction rates: 0.39% [42 of 10,831] in period 1 vs 0.46% [46 of 10,064] in period 2, P=.74; overall adverse events: 0.68% [74 of 10,831] in period 1 vs 0.69% [69 of 10,064] in period 2, P=.99). Discontinuation of extrinsic warming was associated with significantly increased extravasation and overall adverse event rates for iopamidol 370 (extravasation rates: 0.27% [five of 1851] vs 0.87% [18 of 2074], P=.05; allergic-like reaction rates: 0.16% [three of 1851] vs 0.39% [eight of 2074], P=.42; overall adverse events: 0.43% [eight of 1851] vs 1.25% [26 of 2074], P=.02).
CONCLUSION: Extrinsic warming (to 37°C) does not appear to affect adverse event rates for intravenous injections of iopamidol 300 of less than 6 mL/sec but is associated with a significant reduction in extravasation and overall adverse event rates for the more viscous iopamidol 370. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22106356      PMCID: PMC3267082          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Non-ionic contrast media: a comparison of iodine delivery rates during manual injection angiography.

Authors:  P M Hughes; R Bisset
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Haemodynamic and rheological effects of contrast media: the role of viscosity and osmolality.

Authors:  N D Pugh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Heating contrast media: role in contemporary angiography.

Authors:  R D Halsell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Frequency of anaphylactoid reactions during intravenous urography with radiographic contrast media at two different temperatures.

Authors:  E Turner; P Kentor; J L Melamed; G Rao; H J Zeitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.

Authors:  S T Cochran; K Bomyea; J W Sayre
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Adverse reactions to contrast media in CT: effects of temperature and ionic property.

Authors:  M Vergara; S Seguel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparative rheology of low- and iso-osmolarity contrast agents at different temperatures.

Authors:  Jean Brunette; Rosaire Mongrain; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Eric Larose; Richard Leask; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Frequency, management, and outcome of extravasation of nonionic iodinated contrast medium in 69,657 intravenous injections.

Authors:  Carolyn L Wang; Richard H Cohan; James H Ellis; Saroja Adusumilli; N Reed Dunnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to i.v. nonionic iodinated contrast material in children.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Peter J Strouse; James H Ellis; Richard H Cohan; Sophia C Jan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

1.  Frequency, outcome, and risk factors of contrast media extravasation in 142,651 intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans.

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Cheong-Il Shin; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Extrinsic warming of low-osmolality iodinated contrast media to 37°C reduced the rate of allergic-like reaction.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Jing Liu; Yuhao Dong; Baoliang Guo; Zhouyang Lian; Hui Yu; Xiaoning Luo; Xiaokai Mo; Lu Zhang; Wenhui Huang; Fusheng Ouyang; Xinyun Li; Changhong Liang; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  John M Racadio; Soumya R Kashinkunti; Rami A Nachabe; Judy M Racadio; Neil D Johnson; Kamlesh U Kukreja; Manish N Patel; Mary Beth Privitera; Jasmine E Hales; Todd A Abruzzo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-06-05

4.  Post-marketing surveillance study with iodixanol in 20 185 Chinese patients from routine clinical practices.

Authors:  B-C Zhang; L Hou; B Lv; Y-W Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Contrast media extravasations in patients undergoing computerized tomography scanning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and interventions.

Authors:  Sandrine Ding; Nicole Richli Meystre; Cosmin Campeanu; Giuseppe Gullo
Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep       Date:  2018-01

6.  The effect of four-phasic versus three-phasic contrast media injection protocols on extravasation rate in coronary CT angiography: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Júlia Karády; Alexisz Panajotu; Márton Kolossváry; Bálint Szilveszter; Ádám L Jermendy; Andrea Bartykowszki; Mihály Károlyi; Csilla Celeng; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Radiographic and magnetic resonances contrast agents: Essentials and tips for safe practices.

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mohamed A El-Shazly
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-28

8.  Intravenous contrast medium extravasation: systematic review and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines.

Authors:  Giles Roditi; Nadir Khan; Aart J van der Molen; Marie-France Bellin; Michele Bertolotto; Torkel Brismar; Jean-Michel Correas; Ilona A Dekkers; Remy W F Geenen; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Andreas H Mahnken; Carlo C Quattrocchi; Alexander Radbruch; Peter Reimer; Laura Romanini; Fulvio Stacul; Henrik S Thomsen; Olivier Clément
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.