Literature DB >> 8668779

Adverse reactions to contrast media in CT: effects of temperature and ionic property.

M Vergara1, S Seguel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the severity of adverse reactions to contrast media in outpatient computed tomographic (CT) examinations in a conventional clinical setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 4,936 patients, CT was performed with four protocols: ionic contrast medium with sodium meglumine as the cation (in one protocol, contrast material was warmed to 35 degrees C before injection; in another protocol, it was administered at ambient temperature); warmed, ionic contrast medium with nonsodium pure meglumine as the cation; and warmed, nonionic iopamidol.
RESULTS: Adverse reactions to ionic contrast material statistically significantly decreased (P<.05) when it was warmed before administration. Reactions to ionic contrast media without a sodium cation were statistically significantly fewer (P<.001) than reactions to those with a sodium cation. In all protocols, pediatric patients had fewer reactions than adult patients.
CONCLUSION: In outpatient CT examinations, nonionic, warmed contrast medium was the best option because no severe reactions resulted from its use. Prevalence of adverse reactions was comparable to that in controlled randomized studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668779     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Rate of contrast material extravasations and allergic-like reactions: effect of extrinsic warming of low-osmolality iodinated CT contrast material to 37 degrees C.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Carolyn L Wang; Mustafa R Bashir; Amy M Neville; Erik K Paulson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Extrinsic warming of low-osmolality iodinated contrast media to 37°C reduced the rate of allergic-like reaction.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Jing Liu; Yuhao Dong; Baoliang Guo; Zhouyang Lian; Hui Yu; Xiaoning Luo; Xiaokai Mo; Lu Zhang; Wenhui Huang; Fusheng Ouyang; Xinyun Li; Changhong Liang; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  Post-marketing surveillance study with iodixanol in 20 185 Chinese patients from routine clinical practices.

Authors:  B-C Zhang; L Hou; B Lv; Y-W Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Radiographic and magnetic resonances contrast agents: Essentials and tips for safe practices.

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mohamed A El-Shazly
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-28

5.  Chemical stability of oil-infused polyethylene.

Authors:  Fedra P Zaribaf; Harinderjit S Gill; Elise C Pegg
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide in Children and Elderly: An Analysis of 132,850 Patients From 4 Observational Studies and Pharmacovigilance Covering >288 Million Administrations.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Julia Chernova; Christoph Gerlinger; Marcin Pracz; Philipp Lengsfeld; Aasia Bhatti; Alexander Michel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  The impact of warmed intravenous contrast material on the bolus geometry of coronary CT angiography applications.

Authors:  Tuncay Hazirolan; Baris Turkbey; Erhan Akpinar; Murat Canyigit; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Bora Peynircioglu; Z Dicle Balkanci; Deniz Akata; Ferhun Balkanci
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.