Literature DB >> 22105017

Body image and psychological distress after prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women: a prospective long-term follow-up study.

Mariska den Heijer1, Caroline Seynaeve, Reinier Timman, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Kathleen Vanheusden, Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst, Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the course of psychological distress and body image at long-term follow-up (6-9 years) after prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction (PM/BR) in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer, and to identify pre-PM risk factors for poor body image on the long-term.
METHODS: Psychological distress (general and breast cancer specific) and body image (general and breast specific) were assessed in 36 high-risk women before PM (T0), at 6 months (T1) and 6-9 years (T2) after PM/BR. Investigated predictive variables (assessed at T0) for long-term body image (assessed at T2) included psychological distress, body image and coping styles.
RESULTS: Breast cancer specific and general distress significantly decreased from T0 to T1 as well as from T1 to T2. Problems regarding breast related and general body image were significantly higher at T1 than at T0. Subsequently, breast related body image scores significantly decreased from T1 to T2, while the decrease in general body image scores were not significant. Active coping and seeking social support were predictive of lower scores (i.e. less problems) on breast related and general body image at long-term follow-up. Furthermore, higher scores on general body image before PM/BR were predictive for increased general body image scores at long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that psychological distress is decreased after PM/BR, at the cost of persistent problems regarding body image. Exploration of coping styles and body image perception before PM/BR may help to identify vulnerable women who may benefit from additional support.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22105017     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  29 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale.

Authors:  V M T van Verschuer; W W Vrijland; I Mares-Engelberts; T M A L Klem
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jessica P Gopie; Marc A M Mureau; Caroline Seynaeve; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Reinier Timman; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Reconstructions Followed Long Term: A Consecutive Series of 185 Patients.

Authors:  Karin Isaksson; Brita Arver; Matteo Bottai; Andreas Pettersson; Marie Wickman; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Adaptation of couples living with a high risk of breast/ovarian cancer and the association with risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Shapira; Erin Turbitt; Lori H Erby; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein; Gillian W Hooker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Hemming Johansson; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

9.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.