Literature DB >> 22100418

Striatal topography of probability and magnitude information for decisions under uncertainty.

Gregory S Berns1, Emily Bell.   

Abstract

Most decisions involve some element of uncertainty. When the outcomes of these decisions have different likelihoods of occurrence, the decision-maker must consider both the magnitude of each outcome and the probability of its occurrence, but how do individual decision makers combine the two dimensions of magnitude and probability? Here, we approach the problem by separating in time the presentation of magnitude and probability information, and focus the analysis of fMRI activations on the first piece of information only. Thus, we are able to identify distinct neural circuits for the two dimensions without the confounding effect of divided attention or the cognitive operation of combining them. We find that magnitude information correlates with the size of the response of the ventral striatum while probability information correlates with the response in the dorsal striatum. The relative responsiveness of these two striatal regions correlates with the behavioral tendency to weight one more than the other. The results are consistent with a second-order process of information aggregation in which individuals make separate judgments for magnitude and probability and then integrate those judgments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100418      PMCID: PMC3288668          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  47 in total

1.  Prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortex networks underlie decision-making in the presence of uncertainty.

Authors:  M P Paulus; N Hozack; B Zauscher; J E McDowell; L Frank; G G Brown; D L Braff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Human striatal activation reflects degree of stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Caroline F Zink; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Jonathan Chappelow; Megan Martin-Skurski; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Cluster mass inference via random field theory.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Thomas E Nichols; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Striatal prediction error modulates cortical coupling.

Authors:  Hanneke E M den Ouden; Jean Daunizeau; Jonathan Roiser; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making.

Authors:  Vinod Venkatraman; John W Payne; James R Bettman; Mary Frances Luce; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans.

Authors:  Bianca C Wittmann; Nathaniel D Daw; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  12 in total

1.  Synchrony of anterior cingulate cortex and insular-striatal activation predicts ambiguity aversion in individuals with low impulsivity.

Authors:  Young-Chul Jung; Tilman Schulte; Eva M Müller-Oehring; William Hawkes; Kee Namkoong; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Categorization = decision making + generalization.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Impaired adaptation of learning to contingency volatility in internalizing psychopathology.

Authors:  Christopher Gagne; Ondrej Zika; Peter Dayan; Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Role of contingency in striatal response to incentive in adolescents with anxiety.

Authors:  Brenda E Benson; Amanda E Guyer; Eric E Nelson; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Adolescent Decision-Making Under Risk: Neural Correlates and Sex Differences.

Authors:  Ozlem Korucuoglu; Michael P Harms; James T Kennedy; Semyon Golosheykin; Serguei V Astafiev; Deanna M Barch; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Conceptualisation of Uncertainty in Decision Neuroscience Research: Do We Really Know What Types of Uncertainties The Measured Neural Correlates Relate To?

Authors:  Michal Müller; Petr Adámek; Silvie Kotherová; Marek Petrů; Tomáš Bubík; Anna Daušová; Leona Pelíšková
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Spatial smoothing systematically biases the localization of reward-related brain activity.

Authors:  Matthew D Sacchet; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Dynamic routing of task-relevant signals for decision making in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Christopher H Donahue; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  How costs influence decision values for mixed outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Alex Pine
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Disruption of orbitofronto-striatal functional connectivity underlies maladaptive persistent behaviors in alcohol-dependent patients.

Authors:  Seojung Lee; Eun Lee; Jeonghun Ku; Kang-Jun Yoon; Kee Namkoong; Young-Chul Jung
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.