Literature DB >> 20203180

Striatal prediction error modulates cortical coupling.

Hanneke E M den Ouden1, Jean Daunizeau, Jonathan Roiser, Karl J Friston, Klaas E Stephan.   

Abstract

Both perceptual inference and motor responses are shaped by learned probabilities. For example, stimulus-induced responses in sensory cortices and preparatory activity in premotor cortex reflect how (un)expected a stimulus is. This is in accordance with predictive coding accounts of brain function, which posit a fundamental role of prediction errors for learning and adaptive behavior. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and recent advances in computational modeling to investigate how (failures of) learned predictions about visual stimuli influence subsequent motor responses. Healthy volunteers discriminated visual stimuli that were differentially predicted by auditory cues. Critically, the predictive strengths of cues varied over time, requiring subjects to continuously update estimates of stimulus probabilities. This online inference, modeled using a hierarchical Bayesian learner, was reflected behaviorally: speed and accuracy of motor responses increased significantly with predictability of the stimuli. We used nonlinear dynamic causal modeling to demonstrate that striatal prediction errors are used to tune functional coupling in cortical networks during learning. Specifically, the degree of striatal trial-by-trial prediction error activity controls the efficacy of visuomotor connections and thus the influence of surprising stimuli on premotor activity. This finding substantially advances our understanding of striatal function and provides direct empirical evidence for formal learning theories that posit a central role for prediction error-dependent plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203180      PMCID: PMC3044875          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4458-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  77 in total

Review 1.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Human striatal activation reflects degree of stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Caroline F Zink; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Jonathan Chappelow; Megan Martin-Skurski; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Jérémie Mattout; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; John Ashburner; Will Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Johannes Schultz; Ralf Deichmann; Karl Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Free-energy and the brain.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Emily H Trittschuh; Jim M Monti; M Marsel Mesulam; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Effects of motor preparation and spatial attention on corticospinal excitability in a delayed-response paradigm.

Authors:  Rogier B Mars; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07

10.  Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans.

Authors:  Bianca C Wittmann; Nathaniel D Daw; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  115 in total

1.  Changes in corticostriatal connectivity during reinforcement learning in humans.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Tiago V Maia; Rachel Marsh; Xuejun Hao; Dongrong Xu; Yunsuo Duan; Gregory Z Tau; Barbara Graniello; Zhishun Wang; Alayar Kangarlu; Diana Martinez; Mark G Packard; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context.

Authors:  Fraser W Smith; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Glutamatergic model psychoses: prediction error, learning, and inference.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Garry D Honey; John H Krystal; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl; Marcia K Johnson; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Characterizations of resting-state modulatory interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  Xin Di; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The hippocampus is functionally connected to the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex during context dependent decision making.

Authors:  Robert S Ross; Katherine R Sherrill; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  When predictive mechanisms go wrong: disordered visual synchrony thresholds in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Laurence Lalanne; Mitsouko van Assche; Anne Giersch
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The amygdala instructs insular feedback for affective learning.

Authors:  Dominic Kargl; Joanna Kaczanowska; Sophia Ulonska; Florian Groessl; Lukasz Piszczek; Jelena Lazovic; Katja Buehler; Wulf Haubensak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.