Literature DB >> 23110886

Spatial smoothing systematically biases the localization of reward-related brain activity.

Matthew D Sacchet1, Brian Knutson2.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging methods with enhanced spatial resolution such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) suggest that the subcortical striatum plays a critical role in human reward processing. Analysis of FMRI data requires several preprocessing steps, some of which entail tradeoffs. For instance, while spatial smoothing can enhance statistical power, it may also bias localization towards regions that contain more gray than white matter. In a meta-analysis and reanalysis of an existing dataset, we sought to determine whether spatial smoothing could systematically bias the spatial localization of foci related to reward anticipation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). An activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis revealed that peak ventral striatal ALE foci for studies that used smaller spatial smoothing kernels (i.e. <6mm FWHM) were more anterior than those identified for studies that used larger kernels (i.e. >7mm FWHM). Additionally, subtraction analysis of findings for studies that used smaller versus larger smoothing kernels revealed a significant cluster of differential activity in the left relatively anterior NAcc (Talairach coordinates: -10, 9, -1). A second meta-analysis revealed that larger smoothing kernels were correlated with more posterior localizations of NAcc activation foci (p<0.015), but revealed no significant associations with other potentially relevant parameters (including voxel volume, magnet strength, and publication date). Finally, repeated analysis of a representative dataset processed at different smoothing kernels (i.e., 0-12mm) also indicated that smoothing systematically yielded more posterior activation foci in the NAcc (p<0.005). Taken together, these findings indicate that spatial smoothing can systematically bias the spatial localization of striatal activity. These findings have implications both for historical interpretation of past findings related to reward processing and for the analysis of future studies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Monetary incentive delay (MID) task; Nucleus accumbens (NAcc); Reward; Spatial smoothing; Ventral striatum (VS)

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23110886      PMCID: PMC3618861          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  57 in total

1.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.

Authors:  B Knutson; G W Fong; C M Adams; J L Varner; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Brain reward circuitry: insights from unsensed incentives.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Instructed delay activity in the human prefrontal cortex is modulated by monetary reward expectation.

Authors:  N Ramnani; R C Miall
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: description and evaluation.

Authors:  Peter T Fox; Angela R Laird; Sarabeth P Fox; P Mickle Fox; Angela M Uecker; Michelle Crank; Sandra F Koenig; Jack L Lancaster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Different neural systems adjust motor behavior in response to reward and punishment.

Authors:  Jana Wrase; Thorsten Kahnt; Florian Schlagenhauf; Anne Beck; Michael X Cohen; Brian Knutson; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Mick Fox; Martin Wiener; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Christian Grefkes; Ling E Wang; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Lee Hogarth
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcement learning models and their neural correlates: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Poornima Kumar; Simon B Eickhoff; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Bayesian spatial transformation models with applications in neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Michelle F Miranda; Hongtu Zhu; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Altered prefrontal correlates of monetary anticipation and outcome in chronic pain.

Authors:  Katherine T Martucci; Nicholas Borg; Kelly H MacNiven; Brian Knutson; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Alteration of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism in healthy subjects by glucose loading.

Authors:  Kenji Ishibashi; Kei Wagatsuma; Kiichi Ishiwata; Kenji Ishii
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Reproducibility of R-fMRI metrics on the impact of different strategies for multiple comparison correction and sample sizes.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Bin Lu; Chao-Gan Yan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Valence and agency influence striatal response to feedback in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jakub Späti; Justin Chumbley; Nadja Doerig; Janis Brakowski; Martin Grosse Holtforth; Erich Seifritz; Simona Spinelli
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  Disturbed cortico-amygdalar functional connectivity as pathophysiological correlate of working memory deficits in bipolar affective disorder.

Authors:  Katharina Stegmayer; Juliana Usher; Sarah Trost; Ilona Henseler; Heike Tost; Marcella Rietschel; Peter Falkai; Oliver Gruber
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Neural correlates of substance abuse: reduced functional connectivity between areas underlying reward and cognitive control.

Authors:  Julian C Motzkin; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Joseph P Newman; Kent A Kiehl; Michael Koenigs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Quantifying familial influences on brain activation during the monetary incentive delay task: an adolescent monozygotic twin study.

Authors:  Merav H Silverman; Robert F Krueger; William G Iacono; Stephen M Malone; Ruskin H Hunt; Kathleen M Thomas
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Dissociating motivation from reward in human striatal activity.

Authors:  Eric M Miller; Maya U Shankar; Brian Knutson; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.