Literature DB >> 18805493

Cluster mass inference via random field theory.

Hui Zhang1, Thomas E Nichols, Timothy D Johnson.   

Abstract

Cluster extent and voxel intensity are two widely used statistics in neuroimaging inference. Cluster extent is sensitive to spatially extended signals while voxel intensity is better for intense but focal signals. In order to leverage strength from both statistics, several nonparametric permutation methods have been proposed to combine the two methods. Simulation studies have shown that of the different cluster permutation methods, the cluster mass statistic is generally the best. However, to date, there is no parametric cluster mass inference available. In this paper, we propose a cluster mass inference method based on random field theory (RFT). We develop this method for Gaussian images, evaluate it on Gaussian and Gaussianized t-statistic images and investigate its statistical properties via simulation studies and real data. Simulation results show that the method is valid under the null hypothesis and demonstrate that it can be more powerful than the cluster extent inference method. Further, analyses with a single subject and a group fMRI dataset demonstrate better power than traditional cluster size inference, and good accuracy relative to a gold-standard permutation test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18805493      PMCID: PMC2739659          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  15 in total

1.  Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model.

Authors:  S J Kiebel; J B Poline; K J Friston; A P Holmes; K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Testing for anatomically specified regional effects.

Authors:  K J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Order information in working memory: fMRI evidence for parietal and prefrontal mechanisms.

Authors:  C Marshuetz; E E Smith; J Jonides; J DeGutis; T L Chenevert
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods.

Authors:  Satoru Hayasaka; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Diagnosis and exploration of massively univariate neuroimaging models.

Authors:  Wen-Lin Luo; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review.

Authors:  Thomas Nichols; Satoru Hayasaka
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.

Authors:  K J Friston; A Holmes; J B Poline; C J Price; C D Frith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.

Authors:  J B Poline; K J Worsley; A C Evans; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  10 in total

1.  An iterative two-threshold analysis for single-subject functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  Tibor Auer; Renate Schweizer; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Striatal topography of probability and magnitude information for decisions under uncertainty.

Authors:  Gregory S Berns; Emily Bell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An integrated cluster-wise significance measure for fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Yunjiang Ge; Gang Chen; James A Waltz; Liyi Elliot Hong; Peter Kochunov; Shuo Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  MULTIPLE TESTING OF LOCAL MAXIMA FOR DETECTION OF PEAKS IN 1D.

Authors:  Armin Schwartzman; Yulia Gavrilov; Robert J Adler
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.028

5.  MULTIPLE TESTING OF LOCAL MAXIMA FOR DETECTION OF PEAKS IN RANDOM FIELDS.

Authors:  Dan Cheng; Armin Schwartzman
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Disorder-specific dysfunctions in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder during interference inhibition and attention allocation.

Authors:  Katya Rubia; Ana Cubillo; James Woolley; Michael J Brammer; Anna Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Disorder-specific inferior prefrontal hypofunction in boys with pure attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to boys with pure conduct disorder during cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Katya Rubia; Rozmin Halari; Ana Cubillo; Abdul-Majeed Mohammad; Stephen Scott; Michael Brammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional development of fronto-striato-parietal networks associated with time perception.

Authors:  Anna B Smith; Vincent Giampietro; Michael Brammer; Rozmin Halari; Andrew Simmons; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Cognitive behavioral therapy increases amygdala connectivity with the cognitive control network in both MDD and PTSD.

Authors:  Haochang Shou; Zhen Yang; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Philip A Cook; Steven E Bruce; Russell T Shinohara; Benjamin Rosenberg; Yvette I Sheline
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies.

Authors:  Benjamin O Turner; Erick J Paul; Michael B Miller; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-06-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.