Literature DB >> 22099148

Mechanical work performed by the individual legs during uphill and downhill walking.

Jason R Franz1, Nicholas E Lyddon, Rodger Kram.   

Abstract

Previous studies of the mechanical work performed during uphill and downhill walking have neglected the simultaneous negative and positive work performed by the leading and trailing legs during double support. Our goal was to quantify the mechanical work performed by the individual legs across a range of uphill and downhill grades. We hypothesized that during double support, (1) with steeper uphill grade, the negative work performed by the leading leg would become negligible and the trailing leg would perform progressively greater positive work to raise the center of mass (CoM), and (2) with steeper downhill grade, the leading leg would perform progressively greater negative work to lower the CoM and the positive work performed by the trailing leg would become negligible. 11 healthy young adults (6 M/5 F, 71.0±12.3 kg) walked at 1.25 m/s on a dual-belt force-measuring treadmill at seven grades (0, ±3, ±6, ±9°). We collected three-dimensional ground reaction forces (GRFs) and used the individual limbs method to calculate the mechanical work performed by each leg. As hypothesized, the trailing leg performed progressively greater positive work with steeper uphill grade, and the leading leg performed progressively greater negative work with steeper downhill grade (p<0.005). To our surprise, unlike level-ground walking, during double support the leading leg performed considerable positive work when walking uphill and the trailing leg performed considerable negative work when walking downhill (p<0.005). To understand how humans walk uphill and downhill, it is important to consider these revealing biomechanical aspects of individual leg function and interaction during double support.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22099148      PMCID: PMC3246037          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  Kinematic and kinetic comparison of downhill and level walking.

Authors:  M Kuster; S Sakurai; G A Wood
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces.

Authors:  R Kram; T M Griffin; J M Donelan; Y H Chang
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-08

Review 4.  Biomechanics of walking and running: center of mass movements to muscle action.

Authors:  C T Farley; D P Ferris
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Symmetry of ground reaction forces and muscle activity in asymptomatic subjects during walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit tasks.

Authors:  David R Burnett; Naira H Campbell-Kyureghyan; Patricia B Cerrito; Peter M Quesada
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  The effects of sloped surfaces on locomotion: a kinematic and kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Andrea N Lay; Chris J Hass; Robert J Gregor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-11

8.  Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking.

Authors:  J Maxwell Donelan; Rodger Kram; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man.

Authors:  A E Minetti; L P Ardigò; F Saibene
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Mechanics of walking.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; R Margaria
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 3.531

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effects of aging on mechanical efficiency and muscle activation during level and uphill walking.

Authors:  Justus D Ortega; Claire T Farley
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  The correlation between metabolic and individual leg mechanical power during walking at different slopes and velocities.

Authors:  Jana R Jeffers; Arick G Auyang; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The Effects of 3 Weeks of Uphill and Downhill Walking on Blood Lipids and Glucose Metabolism in Pre-Diabetic Men: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marc Philippe; Hannes Gatterer; Erika Maria Eder; Alexander Dzien; Matthias Somavilla; Andreas Melmer; Christoph Ebenbichler; Tom Müller; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Use of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis reduces the metabolic cost of uphill walking and improves leg work symmetry in people with transtibial amputations.

Authors:  Jana R Montgomery; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Advanced age and the mechanics of uphill walking: a joint-level, inverse dynamic analysis.

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Advanced age affects the individual leg mechanics of level, uphill, and downhill walking.

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Foot and shoe responsible for majority of soft tissue work in early stance of walking.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Running for exercise mitigates age-related deterioration of walking economy.

Authors:  Justus D Ortega; Owen N Beck; Jaclyn M Roby; Aria L Turney; Rodger Kram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Increasing prosthetic foot energy return affects whole-body mechanics during walking on level ground and slopes.

Authors:  W Lee Childers; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Maura E Eveld; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.