Literature DB >> 31431348

Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.

Erik P Lamers1, Maura E Eveld2, Karl E Zelik3.   

Abstract

Individuals with lower-limb amputation often have difficulty walking on slopes, in part due to limitations of conventional prosthetic feet. Conventional prostheses have fixed ankle set-point angles and cannot fully replicate able-bodied ankle dynamics. Microprocessor-controlled ankles have been developed to help overcome these limitations. The objective of this study was to characterize how the slope adaptation feature of a microprocessor-controlled ankle affected individual prosthesis user gait biomechanics during sloped walking. Previous studies on similar microprocessor-controlled ankles have focused on group-level results (inter-subject mean), but did not report individual subject results. Our study builds upon prior work and provides new insight by presenting subject-specific results and investigating to what extent individual responses agree with the group-level results. We performed gait analysis on seven individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation while they walked on a 7.5° incline with a recently redesigned microprocessor-controlled ankle that adjusts ankle set-point angle to the slope. We computed gait kinematics and kinetics, and compared how users walked with vs. without this set-point adjustment. The microprocessor-controlled ankle increased minimum toe clearance for all subjects. Despite the microprocessor-controlled ankle behaving similarly for each user, we observed marked differences in individual responses. For instance, two users switched from a forefoot landing pattern with the microprocessor-controlled ankle locked at neutral angle to rearfoot landing when the microprocessor-controlled ankle adapted to the slope, while two maintained a forefoot and three maintained a rearfoot landing pattern across conditions. Changes in knee angle and moment were also subject-specific. Individual user responses were often not well represented by inter-subject mean. Although the prevailing experimental paradigm in prosthetic gait analysis studies is to focus on group-level analysis, our findings call attention to the high inter-subject variability which may necessitate alternative experimental approaches to assess prosthetic interventions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation; Biomechanics; Gait analysis; Incline; Microprocessor ankle; Prostheses

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431348      PMCID: PMC8777384          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  32 in total

1.  Adaptation of the walking pattern to uphill walking in normal and spinal-cord injured subjects.

Authors:  A Leroux; J Fung; H Barbeau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Kinematic and kinetic comparison of downhill and level walking.

Authors:  M Kuster; S Sakurai; G A Wood
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew H Hansen; Dudley S Childress; Steve C Miff; Steven A Gard; Kent P Mesplay
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.

Authors:  A H Vrieling; H G van Keeken; T Schoppen; E Otten; J P K Halbertsma; A L Hof; K Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  A unified deformable (UD) segment model for quantifying total power of anatomical and prosthetic below-knee structures during stance in gait.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Thomas M Kepple; Steven J Stanhope
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Comprehensive non-dimensional normalization of gait data.

Authors:  Ornella Pinzone; Michael H Schwartz; Richard Baker
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Steven H Collins; Peter G Adamczyk; Ava D Segal; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Joseph M Czerniecki; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Prosthetic ankle push-off work reduces metabolic rate but not collision work in non-amputee walking.

Authors:  Joshua M Caputo; Steven H Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; John G Buckley
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Ahmad Reza Baghestani; Mohsen Vahedi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2012
View more
  5 in total

1.  Unilateral below-knee prosthesis users walking on uneven terrain: The effect of adding a toe joint to a passive prosthesis.

Authors:  Kirsty A McDonald; Rachel H Teater; Justin P Cruz; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Adding a toe joint to a prosthesis: walking biomechanics, energetics, and preference of individuals with unilateral below-knee limb loss.

Authors:  Kirsty A McDonald; Rachel H Teater; Justin P Cruz; John T Kerr; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.

Authors:  Michael Ernst; Björn Altenburg; Thomas Schmalz; Andreas Kannenberg; Malte Bellmann
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Factors leading to falls in transfemoral prosthesis users: a case series of sound-side stumble recovery responses.

Authors:  Maura E Eveld; Shane T King; Karl E Zelik; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.208

5.  Patient-Preferred Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Alignment for Ramps and Level-Ground Walking.

Authors:  Max K Shepherd; Ann M Simon; Joey Zisk; Levi J Hargrove
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.802

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.