Literature DB >> 8145168

Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man.

A E Minetti1, L P Ardigò, F Saibene.   

Abstract

1. The metabolic cost and the mechanical work at different speeds during uphill, level and downhill walking have been measured in four subjects. 2. The mechanical work has been partitioned into the internal work (W(int)), due to the speed changes of body segment with respect to the body centre of mass (BCM), and the external work (W(ext)), related to the position and speed changes of the BCM in the environment. 3. W(ext) has been further divided into a positive part W+ext) and a negative one (W-(ext)), associated with the energy increases and decreases, respectively, over the stride period. 4. For all constant speeds the most economical gradient has been found to be -10.2% (+/- 0.8 S.D.). 5. At each gradient there is a unique W+ext/W-ext ratio (= 1 in level walking), regardless of speed, with a tendency for W-ext and W+ext to vanish above +15% and below -15% gradient, respectively. 6. W(int) is constant at each speed regardless of gradient. This is partly explained by an only slight decrease in stride frequency at increasing gradient. W(int) constancy implies that it has no role in determining the optimum gradient. 7. A linear multiple regression relating W+ext and W-ext to the metabolic cost at different gradients showed that negative (eff-) and positive (eff+) efficiencies decrease with increasing speed (from 0.912 to 0.726, and from 0.182 to 0.146, respectively). The eff-/eff+ ratio, however, remains rather constant (4.995 +/- 0.125 S.D.). 8. We conclude that the measured W(ext), the W+ext/W-ext partitioning and eff-/eff+ ratio, i.e. the different efficiency of the muscles used as force and brake generators, can explain the metabolic optimum gradient at about -10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8145168      PMCID: PMC1160509          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  17 in total

1.  The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject.

Authors:  W T Dempster; W C Gabel; W J Felts
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The sources of external work in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; H Thys; A Zamboni
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M Kaneko
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The chemical energetics of muscle contraction. II. The chemistry, efficiency and power of maximally working sartorius muscles. Appendix. Free energy and enthalpy of atp hydrolysis in the sarcoplasm.

Authors:  M J Kushmerick; R E Davies
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1969-12-23

5.  The physiological responses to running downhill.

Authors:  C T Davies; A J Sargeant; B Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1974-03-28

6.  Negative (eccentric) work. II. Physiological responses to walking uphill and downhill on a motor-driven treadmill.

Authors:  C T Davies; C Barnes
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Mechanical efficiency of pure positive and pure negative work with special reference to the work intensity.

Authors:  O Aura; P V Komi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  The efficiency of human movement--a statement of the problem.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; R Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  A model for the calculation of mechanical power during distance running.

Authors:  K R Williams; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The mechanical efficiency of locomotion in men and women with special emphasis on stretch-shortening cycle exercises.

Authors:  O Aura; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986
View more
  33 in total

1.  The optimal locomotion on gradients: walking, running or cycling?

Authors:  L P Ardigò; F Saibene; A E Minetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Propulsive Forces Applied to the Body's Center of Mass Affect Metabolic Energetics Poststroke.

Authors:  Kelly Penke; Korre Scott; Yunna Sinskey; Michael D Lewek
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Himalayan porter's specialization: metabolic power, economy, efficiency and skill.

Authors:  Alberto E Minetti; Federico Formenti; Luca P Ardigò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion.

Authors:  Paul DeVita; Joseph Helseth; Tibor Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Biomechanics and energetics of walking on uneven terrain.

Authors:  Alexandra S Voloshina; Arthur D Kuo; Monica A Daley; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The biomechanics of skipping gaits: a third locomotion paradigm?

Authors:  A E Minetti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The correlation between metabolic and individual leg mechanical power during walking at different slopes and velocities.

Authors:  Jana R Jeffers; Arick G Auyang; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Differential activation of lumbar and sacral motor pools during walking at different speeds and slopes.

Authors:  A H Dewolf; Y P Ivanenko; K E Zelik; F Lacquaniti; P A Willems
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.

Authors:  Caroline Praz; Benedikt Fasel; Philippe Vuistiner; Kamiar Aminian; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Caroline Praz; Benedikt Fasel; Philippe Vuistiner; Kamiar Aminian; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.