Literature DB >> 22095974

Selective attention warps spatial representation: parallel but opposing effects on attended versus inhibited objects.

Brandon M Liverence1, Brian J Scholl.   

Abstract

Selective attention not only influences which objects in a display are perceived, but also directly changes the character of how they are perceived--for example, making attended objects appear larger or sharper. In studies of multiple-object tracking and probe detection, we explored the influence of sustained selective attention on where objects are seen to be in relation to each other in dynamic multi-object displays. Surprisingly, we found that sustained attention can warp the representation of space in a way that is object-specific: In immediate recall of the positions of objects that have just disappeared, space between targets is compressed, whereas space between distractors is expanded. These effects suggest that sustained attention can warp spatial representation in unexpected ways.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22095974     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611422543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  8 in total

1.  Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Zhuolun Li; Ke Zhang; Quan Lei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

3.  Invalidly cued targets are well localized when detected.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Junjun Zhang; Sarah Shomstein; Joseph C Nah; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Connectome-based neurofeedback: A pilot study to improve sustained attention.

Authors:  Dustin Scheinost; Tiffany W Hsu; Emily W Avery; Michelle Hampson; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun; Monica D Rosenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; James A Mazer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-05

7.  On spatial attention and its field size on the repulsion effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Temporal context affects the perceived time of visual events.

Authors:  Ljubica Jovanovic; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.