Literature DB >> 26810574

Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.

Jeffrey S Johnson1,2, John P Spencer3.   

Abstract

Studies examining the relationship between spatial attention and spatial working memory (SWM) have shown that discrimination responses are faster for targets appearing at locations that are being maintained in SWM, and that location memory is impaired when attention is withdrawn during the delay. These observations support the proposal that sustained attention is required for successful retention in SWM: If attention is withdrawn, memory representations are likely to fail, increasing errors. In the present study, this proposal was reexamined in light of a neural-process model of SWM. On the basis of the model's functioning, we propose an alternative explanation for the observed decline in SWM performance when a secondary task is performed during retention: SWM representations drift systematically toward the location of targets appearing during the delay. To test this explanation, participants completed a color discrimination task during the delay interval of a spatial-recall task. In the critical shifting-attention condition, the color stimulus could appear either toward or away from the midline reference axis, relative to the memorized location. We hypothesized that if shifting attention during the delay leads to the failure of SWM representations, there should be an increase in the variance of recall errors, but no change in directional errors, regardless of the direction of the shift. Conversely, if shifting attention induces drift of SWM representations-as predicted by the model-systematic changes in the patterns of spatial-recall errors should occur that would depend on the direction of the shift. The results were consistent with the latter possibility-recall errors were biased toward the locations of discrimination targets appearing during the delay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Attention: Theoretical and computational models; Spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26810574      PMCID: PMC4864137          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-1058-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  56 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity.

Authors:  X J Wang
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.

Authors:  F G Ashby; W Prinzmetal; R Ivry; W T Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Shifting attention in visual space: tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model.

Authors:  D LaBerge; R L Carlson; J K Williams; B G Bunney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Hierarchy of hue maps in the primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Youping Xiao
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-01

8.  Saccadic motor planning by integrating visual information and pre-information on neural dynamic fields.

Authors:  K Kopecz; G Schöner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The role of experience in location estimation: Target distributions shift location memory biases.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Vanessa R Simmering; Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-02-08

10.  Biased feedback in spatial recall yields a violation of delta rule learning.

Authors:  John Lipinski; John P Spencer; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

2.  Developmental improvements in the resolution and capacity of visual working memory share a common source.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Hilary E Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Connecting the Dots: Finding Continuity Across Visuospatial Tasks and Development.

Authors:  Sammy Perone; Vanessa R Simmering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.