Literature DB >> 9916782

Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography.

A Laib1, P Rüegsegger.   

Abstract

It has recently been shown that high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have the potential to assess information about the microarchitecture of bone in a noninvasive way. However, due to the limited spatial resolution of the in vivo measurements, the individual trabeculae are not depicted with their true thickness. Nevertheless, the spacing of the structural elements allows the assessment of trabecular number. In a previous publication, the ridge number density (RND) was introduced as a measure for this structural index. It can be extracted from high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) images of patients and shows a reproducibility of 1.6%. In this work the Ridge extraction procedure is compared to and calibrated with microcomputed tomography (microCT) measurements. Three-dimensional measurements of 15 bone biopsies are made with a 28-microm-resolution microCT scanner as well as with a 165-microm-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner. For the latter, the same settings are used as for patient examinations. The 15 pairs of measurements are analyzed and the resulting structural indices are compared. The results show that structural indices such as trabecular number, mean thickness, and mean separation can be determined from the 3D pQCT data with an r2 of between 0.81 and 0.96 if the microCT data are taken as the gold standard. The calibration equation found for the bone volume fraction has an intercept of 0.04 and a slope of 0.86 (r2 = 0.98), and trabecular number as the main additional structural index shows a nonsignificant intercept and a calibration slope of 0.91 with the microCT. The calibration procedure can be used directly for patient examinations. Applied to time-series measurements it may be of value for monitoring and quantifying microarchitectural changes due to therapy or aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9916782     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00159-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  95 in total

1.  Bone microarchitecture assessment: current and future trends.

Authors:  Ralph Müller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effect of voxel size on high-resolution peripheral computed tomography measurements of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure.

Authors:  Willy Tjong; Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quantitative characterization of subject motion in HR-pQCT images of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

Authors:  C A Sell; J N Masi; A Burghardt; D Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Three-dimensional texture analysis of cancellous bone cores evaluated at clinical CT resolutions.

Authors:  Chad Showalter; Bradley D Clymer; Bradford Richmond; Kimerly Powell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; X Edward Guo; X Henry Zhang; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Application of high-resolution skeletal imaging to measurements of volumetric BMD and skeletal microarchitecture in Chinese-American and white women: explanation of a paradox.

Authors:  Marcella D Walker; Donald J McMahon; Julia Udesky; George Liu; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 9.  Chronic kidney disease and bone fracture: a growing concern.

Authors:  Thomas L Nickolas; Mary B Leonard; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Rapid cortical bone loss in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Thomas L Nickolas; Emily M Stein; Elzbieta Dworakowski; Kyle K Nishiyama; Mafo Komandah-Kosseh; Chiyuan A Zhang; Donald J McMahon; Xiaowei S Liu; Stephanie Boutroy; Serge Cremers; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.