Literature DB >> 22090384

Bumble-bee learning selects for both early and long flowering in food-deceptive plants.

Antonina I Internicola1, Lawrence D Harder.   

Abstract

Most rewardless orchids engage in generalized food-deception, exhibiting floral traits typical of rewarding species and exploiting the instinctive foraging of pollinators. Generalized food-deceptive (GFD) orchids compete poorly with rewarding species for pollinator services, which may be overcome by flowering early in the growing season when relatively more pollinators are naive and fewer competing plant species are flowering, and/or flowering for extended periods to enhance the chance of pollinator visits. We tested these hypotheses by manipulating flowering time and duration in a natural population of Calypso bulbosa and quantifying pollinator visitation based on pollen removal. Both early and long flowering increased bumble-bee visitation compared with late and brief flowering, respectively. To identify the cause of reduced visitation during late flowering, we tested whether negative experience with C. bulbosa (avoidance learning) and positive experience with a rewarding species, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, (associative learning) by captive bumble-bees could reduce C. bulbosa's competitiveness. Avoidance learning explained the higher visitation of early- compared with late-flowering C. bulbosa. The resulting pollinator-mediated selection for early flowering may commonly affect GFD orchids, explaining their tendency to flower earlier than rewarding orchids. For dissimilar deceptive and rewarding sympatric species, associative learning may additionally favour early flowering by GFD species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090384      PMCID: PMC3282337          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  The potential for floral mimicry in rewardless orchids: an experimental study.

Authors:  Luc D B Gigord; M R Macnair; M Stritesky; Ann Smithson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids.

Authors:  Jana Jersáková; Steven D Johnson; Pavel Kindlmann
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-05

Review 3.  Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions.

Authors:  Jelmer A Elzinga; Anne Atlan; Arjen Biere; Luc Gigord; Arthur E Weis; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Displacement of flowering phenologies among plant species by competition for generalist pollinators.

Authors:  Céline Devaux; R Lande
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Should food-deceptive species flower before or after rewarding species? An experimental test of pollinator visitation behaviour under contrasting phenologies.

Authors:  A I Internicola; G Bernasconi; L D B Gigord
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae.

Authors:  M R Neiland; C C Wilcock
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  The timing of food-deceptive flowers: a commentary on Internicola et al. (2008).

Authors:  G D Ruxton; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Lars Chittka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Reproductive success of non-rewarding Cypripedium japonicum benefits from low spatial dispersion pattern and asynchronous flowering.

Authors:  Hai-Qin Sun; Jin Cheng; Fu-Min Zhang; Yi-Bo Luo; Song Ge
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sensory bias and signal detection trade-offs maintain intersexual floral mimicry.

Authors:  Avery L Russell; David W Kikuchi; Noah W Giebink; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Pollination system and the effect of inflorescence size on fruit set in the deceptive orchid Cephalanthera falcata.

Authors:  Kenji Suetsugu; Risa S Naito; Shigeki Fukushima; Atsushi Kawakita; Makoto Kato
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Masquerading as pea plants: behavioural and morphological evidence for mimicry of multiple models in an Australian orchid.

Authors:  Daniela Scaccabarozzi; Salvatore Cozzolino; Lorenzo Guzzetti; Andrea Galimberti; Lynne Milne; Kingsley W Dixon; Ryan D Phillips
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  How scent and nectar influence floral antagonists and mutualists.

Authors:  Danny Kessler; Mario Kallenbach; Celia Diezel; Eva Rothe; Mark Murdock; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The signalling game between plants and pollinators.

Authors:  Shan Sun; Michael I Leshowitz; Jan Rychtář
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Temporal Structure in Cooperative Interactions: What Does the Timing of Exploitation Tell Us about Its Cost?

Authors:  Jessica L Barker; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.