Literature DB >> 17573151

Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions.

Jelmer A Elzinga1, Anne Atlan, Arjen Biere, Luc Gigord, Arthur E Weis, Giorgina Bernasconi.   

Abstract

The role of biotic interactions in shaping plant flowering phenology has long been controversial; plastic responses to the abiotic environment, limited precision of biological clocks and inconsistency of selection pressures have generally been emphasized to explain phenological variation. However, part of this variation is heritable and selection analyses show that biotic interactions can modulate selection on flowering phenology. Our review of the literature indicates that pollinators tend to favour peak or earlier flowering, whereas pre-dispersal seed predators tend to favour off-peak or later flowering. However, effects strongly vary among study systems. To understand such variation, future studies should address the impact of mutualist and antagonist dispersal ability, ecological specialization, and habitat and plant population characteristics. Here, we outline future directions to study how such interactions shape flowering phenology.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573151     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  100 in total

1.  Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; David Wagner; Bryan N Danforth; Sheila Colla; Sarah Kornbluth; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jessica Forrest; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Robust control of the seasonal expression of the Arabidopsis FLC gene in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Shinichiro Aikawa; Masaki J Kobayashi; Akiko Satake; Kentaro K Shimizu; Hiroshi Kudoh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Incipient allochronic speciation due to non-selective assortative mating by flowering time, mutation and genetic drift.

Authors:  Céline Devaux; Russell Lande
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Nonlinear flowering responses to climate: are species approaching their limits of phenological change?

Authors:  Amy M Iler; Toke T Høye; David W Inouye; Niels M Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Reproductive system of a mixed-mating plant responds to climate perturbation by increased selfing.

Authors:  N T Jones; B C Husband; A S MacDougall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Mutualists and antagonists drive among-population variation in selection and evolution of floral display in a perennial herb.

Authors:  Jon Agren; Frida Hellström; Per Toräng; Johan Ehrlén
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Within-season flowering interruptions are common in the water-limited Sky Islands.

Authors:  Theresa M Crimmins; David C Bertelsen; Michael A Crimmins
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 9.  The impact of plant and flower age on mating patterns.

Authors:  Diane L Marshall; Joy J Avritt; Satya Maliakal-Witt; Juliana S Medeiros; Marieken G M Shaner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Flowering phenology and reproductive fitness along a mountain slope: maladaptive responses to transplantation to a warmer climate in Campanula thyrsoides.

Authors:  J F Scheepens; J Stöcklin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.