Literature DB >> 30184161

Masquerading as pea plants: behavioural and morphological evidence for mimicry of multiple models in an Australian orchid.

Daniela Scaccabarozzi1,2,3, Salvatore Cozzolino2, Lorenzo Guzzetti4, Andrea Galimberti4, Lynne Milne5, Kingsley W Dixon1, Ryan D Phillips3,6,7.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: While there is increasing recognition of Batesian floral mimicry in plants, there are few confirmed cases where mimicry involves more than one model species. Here, we test for pollination by mimicry in Diuris (Orchidaceae), a genus hypothesized to attract pollinators via mimicry of a range of co-occurring pea plants (Faboideae).
Methods: Observations of pollinator behaviour were made for Diuris brumalis using arrays of orchid flowers. An analysis of floral traits in the co-flowering community and spectral reflectance measurements were undertaken to test if Di. brumalis and the pea plants showed strong similarity and were likely to be perceived as the same by bees. Pollen removal and fruit-set were recorded at 18 sites over two years to test if fitness of Di. brumalis increased with the abundance of the model species. Key
Results: Diuris brumalis shares the pollinator species Trichococolletes capillosus and T. leucogenys (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) with co-flowering Faboideae from the genus Daviesia. On Di. brumalis, Trichocolletes exhibited the same stereotyped food-foraging and mate-patrolling behaviour that they exhibit on Daviesia. Diuris and pea plants showed strong morphological similarity compared to the co-flowering plant community, while the spectral reflectance of Diuris was similar to that of Daviesia spp. Fruit-set and pollen removal of Di. brumalis was highest at sites with a greater number of Daviesia flowers. Conclusions: Diuris brumalis is pollinated by mimicry of co-occurring congeneric Faboideae species. Evidence for mimicry of multiple models, all of which share pollinator species, suggests that this may represent a guild mimicry system. Interestingly, Di. brumalis belongs to a complex of species with similar floral traits, suggesting that this represents a useful system for investigating speciation in lineages that employ mimicry of food plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30184161      PMCID: PMC6266105          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  25 in total

1.  Pollinator specificity, floral odour chemistry and the phylogeny of Australian sexually deceptive Chiloglottis orchids: implications for pollinator-driven speciation.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Daniel Ebert; Jacqueline Poldy; Russell A Barrow; Wittko Francke; Colin C Bower; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Chemical and morphological filters in a specialized floral mimicry system.

Authors:  Florent Martos; Marie-Louise Cariou; Thierry Pailler; Jacques Fournel; Benny Bytebier; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Looks matter: changes in flower form affect pollination effectiveness in a sexually deceptive orchid.

Authors:  D Rakosy; M Cuervo; H F Paulus; M Ayasse
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Experimental examination of pollinator-mediated selection in a sexually deceptive orchid.

Authors:  Marinus L de Jager; Rod Peakall
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Mimicry for all modalities.

Authors:  Anastasia H Dalziell; Justin A Welbergen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Bumble-bee learning selects for both early and long flowering in food-deceptive plants.

Authors:  Antonina I Internicola; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants.

Authors:  F Barbero; S Bonelli; J A Thomas; E Balletto; K Schönrogge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Mimics and magnets: the importance of color and ecological facilitation in floral deception.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Conditioning procedure and color discrimination in the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-04-23

10.  How to look like a mallow: evidence of floral mimicry between Turneraceae and Malvaceae.

Authors:  Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Anna M Wertlen; Andrea A Cocucci
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changing How Biologists View Flowers-Color as a Perception Not a Trait.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Ryan D Phillips; Craig I Peter; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Why Variation in Flower Color May Help Reproductive Success in the Endangered Australian Orchid Caladenia fulva.

Authors:  Georgia Basist; Adrian G Dyer; Jair E Garcia; Ruth E Raleigh; Ann C Lawrie
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  A bee's eye view of remarkable floral colour patterns in the south-west Australian biodiversity hotspot revealed by false colour photography.

Authors:  Klaus Lunau; Daniela Scaccabarozzi; Larissa Willing; Kingsley Dixon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.040

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.