OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy on mortality, in light of evidence that bilateral oophorectomy among premenopausal women rapidly reduces endogenous hormone levels, thereby modifying risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. DESIGN: The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a prospective cohort study of 133,479 women initiated in 1995-1996 through a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. SETTING: None. PATIENT(S): California Teachers Study participants who, at baseline, reported having surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy (n = 9,785), were compared with participants with natural menopause (n = 32,219). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We investigated whether bilateral oophorectomy was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality, overall and by menopausal hormone therapy use status. RESULT(S): Among participants aged <45 years at menopause, multivariable relative risks were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66-1.11), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67-1.23) for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cancer mortality, respectively. Among participants with an age at menopause of ≥45 years, multivariable relative risks were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.98) for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, respectively. The association between bilateral oophorectomy and mortality did not differ by baseline status of hormone therapy use. CONCLUSION(S): Surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy vs. natural menopause does not increase all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy on mortality, in light of evidence that bilateral oophorectomy among premenopausal women rapidly reduces endogenous hormone levels, thereby modifying risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. DESIGN: The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a prospective cohort study of 133,479 women initiated in 1995-1996 through a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. SETTING: None. PATIENT(S): California Teachers Study participants who, at baseline, reported having surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy (n = 9,785), were compared with participants with natural menopause (n = 32,219). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We investigated whether bilateral oophorectomy was associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality, overall and by menopausal hormone therapy use status. RESULT(S): Among participants aged <45 years at menopause, multivariable relative risks were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66-1.11), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67-1.23) for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cancer mortality, respectively. Among participants with an age at menopause of ≥45 years, multivariable relative risks were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.98) for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, respectively. The association between bilateral oophorectomy and mortality did not differ by baseline status of hormone therapy use. CONCLUSION(S): Surgical menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy vs. natural menopause does not increase all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality.
Authors: Walter A Rocca; Brandon R Grossardt; Mariza de Andrade; George D Malkasian; L Joseph Melton Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: F Grodstein; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; J E Manson; M Joffe; B Rosner; C Fuchs; S E Hankinson; D J Hunter; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel O Stram; Yuan Liu; Katherine D Henderson; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Jianning Luo; Tanmai Saxena; Peggy Reynolds; Ellen T Chang; Susan L Neuhausen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin Journal: Menopause Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Brian Morrow; Michelle N Podgornik; Kate M Brett; Polly A Marchbanks Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Donna Shoupe; William H Parker; Michael S Broder; Zhimei Liu; Cindy Farquhar; Jonathan S Berek Journal: Menopause Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: William H Parker; Michael S Broder; Eunice Chang; Diane Feskanich; Cindy Farquhar; Zhimae Liu; Donna Shoupe; Jonathan S Berek; Susan Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Gretchen L Gierach; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Deesha A Patel; Amanda Black; Catherine Schairer; Abegail Gill; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman Journal: Menopause Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Phuong L Mai; Austin Miller; Amanda Black; Roni T Falk; John F Boggess; Katherine Tucker; Ashley R Stuckey; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Cheung Wong; Thomas T Amatruda; Kelly J Wilkinson; Susan C Modesitt; S Diane Yamada; Kristin L Bixel; Gretchen E Glaser; Peter G Rose; Mark H Greene; Mark E Sherman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Tiffany R Sanchez; Yaa Asantewaa Kafui Klu; Jeanine M Genkinger; James V Lacey; Nadia T Chung; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Hazel B Nichols; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Polly A Newcomb; Kathleen M Egan; Linda J Titus; John M Hampton; Kala Visvanathan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Walter A Rocca; Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; Carin Y Smith; Brandon R Grossardt; Stephanie S Faubion; Lynne T Shuster; Elizabeth A Stewart; Michelle M Mielke; Kejal Kantarci; Virginia M Miller Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Duke Appiah; Pamela J Schreiner; Julie K Bower; Barbara Sternfeld; Cora E Lewis; Melissa F Wellons Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 5.363
Authors: Duke Appiah; Stephen J Winters; Susan B Muldoon; Carlton A Hornung; Jane A Cauley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 19.112