Literature DB >> 24253486

Long-term overall and disease-specific mortality associated with benign gynecologic surgery performed at different ages.

Gretchen L Gierach1, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Deesha A Patel, Amanda Black, Catherine Schairer, Abegail Gill, Louise A Brinton, Mark E Sherman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is frequently performed with hysterectomy for nonmalignant conditions, defining health outcomes associated with benign bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed at different ages is critical.
METHODS: We assessed mortality risk associated with benign total abdominal hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among 52,846 Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project follow-up study participants. Surgery and risk factor data were ascertained via baseline interview (1979-1986) and three questionnaires (1987-1998). During follow-up through December 2005 (mean, 22.1 y), 13,734 deaths were identified. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for overall and disease-specific mortality for total abdominal hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by age 35, 40, 45, 50, or 55 years, compared with not having surgery, using landmark analyses and multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: Undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by age 35 years was associated with increased mortality risk (HR35 y, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34), which decreased with age (HR40 y, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21; HR45 y, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Total abdominal hysterectomy alone performed by age 40 years was associated with increased mortality risk to a lesser extent (HR40 y, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15). Analyses based on matched propensity scores related to having gynecologic surgery yielded similar results. Elevated mortality risks were largely attributable to noncancer causes.
CONCLUSIONS: Benign gynecologic surgeries among young women are associated with increased mortality risk, which attenuates with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24253486      PMCID: PMC4113222          DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  22 in total

1.  The impact of clinical trials on the use of hormone replacement therapy. A population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy Kim; Cary Gross; Jeptha Curtis; Glen Stettin; Stephen Wogen; Nami Choe; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The effect of hysterectomy on the age at ovarian failure: identification of a subgroup of women with premature loss of ovarian function and literature review.

Authors:  N Siddle; P Sarrel; M Whitehead
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Adipose tissue as a source of hormones.

Authors:  P K Siiteri
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Hysterectomy use: the correspondence between self-reports and hospital records.

Authors:  K M Brett; J H Madans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Usefulness of prior hysterectomy as an independent predictor of Framingham risk score (The Women's Health Initiative).

Authors:  Judith Hsia; David Barad; Karen Margolis; Rebecca Rodabough; Peter G McGovern; Marian C Limacher; Albert Oberman; Sylvia Smoller
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Analysis of survival by tumor response.

Authors:  J R Anderson; K C Cain; R D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; W B Stason; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Agreement of self-reported ovarian number following gynecologic surgery with medical record reports.

Authors:  K L Irwin; P A Wingo; N C Lee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; W C Willett; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management.

Authors:  S S Faubion; C L Kuhle; L T Shuster; W A Rocca
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 2.  Management of ovarian cancer risk in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Melissa Walker; Michelle Jacobson; Mara Sobel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Moving Toward Individualized Medicine for Uterine Leiomyomas.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Hormone replacement therapy in young women with surgical primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Philip M Sarrel; Shannon D Sullivan; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Zaraq Khan; Amy L Weaver; Carin Y Smith; Walter A Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Women-specific factors to consider in risk, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ronée E Harvey; Kirsten E Coffman; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

7.  Menopausal Estrogen-Alone Therapy and Health Outcomes in Women With and Without Bilateral Oophorectomy: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  JoAnn E Manson; Aaron K Aragaki; Shari S Bassuk; Rowan T Chlebowski; Garnet L Anderson; Jacques E Rossouw; Barbara V Howard; Cynthia A Thomson; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrew M Kaunitz; Carolyn J Crandall; Charles B Eaton; Victor W Henderson; Simin Liu; Juhua Luo; Thomas Rohan; Aladdin H Shadyab; Gretchen Wells; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Variations by History of Military Service and Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Kristen E Gray; Laurie C Zephyrin; Laura B Harrington; Megan R Gerber; Barbara B Cochrane; Julie C Weitlauf; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Lori A Bastian; Kristin M Mattocks; Sally G Haskell; Jodie G Katon
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-02

9.  Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.

Authors:  Laura A M van Lieshout; Miranda P Steenbeek; Joanne A De Hullu; M Caroline Vos; Saskia Houterman; Jack Wilkinson; Jurgen Mj Piek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-28

10.  Changing trends in Black-White racial differences in surgical menopause: a population-based study.

Authors:  Maya A Wright; Kemi M Doll; Evan Myers; William R Carpenter; Danielle R Gartner; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 10.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.