Literature DB >> 9187066

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality.

F Grodstein1, M J Stampfer, G A Colditz, W C Willett, J E Manson, M Joffe, B Rosner, C Fuchs, S E Hankinson, D J Hunter, C H Hennekens, F E Speizer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal hormone therapy has both benefits and hazards, including decreased risks of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease and an increased risk of breast cancer.
METHODS: We examined the relation between the use of postmenopausal hormones and mortality among participants in the Nurses' Health Study, who were 30 to 55 years of age at base line in 1976. Data were collected by biennial questionnaires beginning in 1976 and continuing through 1992. We documented 3637 deaths from 1976 to 1994. Each participant who died was matched with 10 controls alive at the time of her death. For each death, we defined the subject's hormone status according to the last biennial questionnaire before her death or before the diagnosis of the fatal disease; this reduced bias caused by the discontinuation of hormone use between the time of diagnosis of a potentially fatal disease and death.
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding variables, current hormone users had a lower risk of death (relative risk, 0.63; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.70) than subjects who had never taken hormones; however, the apparent benefit decreased with long-term use (relative risk, 0.80; 0.67 to 0.96, after 10 or more years) because of an increase in mortality from breast cancer among long-term hormone users. Current hormone users with coronary risk factors (69 percent of the women) had the largest reduction in mortality (relative risk, 0.51; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.57), with substantially less benefit for those at low risk (13 percent of the women; relative risk, 0.89; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.28).
CONCLUSIONS: On average, mortality among women who use postmenopausal hormones is lower than among nonusers; however, the survival benefit diminishes with longer duration of use and is lower for women at low risk for coronary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9187066     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199706193362501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  104 in total

1.  Guidelines for osteoporosis in coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  E M Scott; I Gaywood; B B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  The privatization of risk.

Authors:  B Rockhill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with diabetes mellitus: a risk-benefit assessment.

Authors:  B Andersson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Low use of long-term hormone replacement therapy in Denmark.

Authors:  C Olesen; F H Steffensen; H T Sørensen; G L Nielsen; J Olsen; U Bergman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Assessment of the risk for venous thromboembolism among users of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  E Oger; P Y Scarabin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss with cyclical etidronate.

Authors:  S Adami; V Bruni; D Bianchini; A Becorpi; P Lombardi; C Campagnoli; A Ferrari; T Marchesoni; R Balena
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Atherosclerotic plaque morphology and coronary thrombi.

Authors:  Allen P Burke; Andrew Farb; Frank D Kolodgie; Jagat Narula; Renu Virmani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Large-scale hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy: results from an international comparison among European and North American populations.

Authors:  S Panico; R Galasso; E Celentano; A V Ciardullo; L Frova; R Capocaccia; M Trevisan; F Berrino
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Psychosocial factors and public health: a suitable case for treatment?

Authors:  J Macleod; G Davey Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  [Anti-aging. Facts and visions].

Authors:  N Y Schürer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.