Literature DB >> 24487726

Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women.

Deborah A Boggs1, Julie R Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: African American women are more likely to undergo hysterectomy, with or without bilateral oophorectomy, at younger ages than white women. It is well established that women who have a bilateral oophorectomy at younger ages are at reduced risk of breast cancer, and there is some evidence of an increased risk of colorectal and lung cancer.
METHODS: Using data from 44,514 women in the Black Women's Health Study, we prospectively investigated the relation of hysterectomy and oophorectomy to incidence of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer and to mortality from cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression with control for confounding factors.
RESULTS: During 16 years of follow-up, hysterectomy alone, relative to no hysterectomy, was not associated with risk of breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. Bilateral oophorectomy, relative to hysterectomy with ovarian conservation, was inversely associated with risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.45-0.85) but not with ER-negative breast cancer; age at surgery and menopausal hormone use did not modify the associations. HRs for the association of bilateral oophorectomy with incidence of colorectal and lung cancer were nonsignificantly increased for women who had surgery before age 40 years and had used menopausal hormones for less than 2 years (HR 1.65; 95 % CI 0.73-3.73 for colorectal cancer and HR 1.71; 95 % CI 0.68-4.31 for lung cancer). Bilateral oophorectomy was not associated with cancer mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral oophorectomy was associated with reduced risk of ER+ breast cancer regardless of age at surgery and use of menopausal hormones. There were nonsignificant increases in risk of colorectal and lung cancer for women with oophorectomy at younger ages and short duration of menopausal hormone use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487726      PMCID: PMC4447185          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-014-0353-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  34 in total

1.  Menopause and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Trichopoulos; B MacMahon; P Cole
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Exogenous hormones, reproductive history, and colon cancer (Seattle, Washington, USA).

Authors:  E J Jacobs; E White; N S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Menopausal hormones and breast cancer in a biracial population.

Authors:  P G Moorman; H Kuwabara; R C Millikan; B Newman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Dual effect of parity on breast cancer risk in African-American women.

Authors:  Julie R Palmer; Lauren A Wise; Nicholas J Horton; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Julie K Bower; Pamela J Schreiner; Barbara Sternfeld; Cora E Lewis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jill R Johnson; James V Lacey; Deann Lazovich; Melissa A Geller; Catherine Schairer; Arthur Schatzkin; Andrew Flood
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Characteristics of menstruation and pregnancy and the risk of lung cancer in women.

Authors:  Anita Koushik; Marie-Elise Parent; Jack Siemiatycki
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Validation of self-reported history of hysterectomy and oophorectomy among women in an integrated group practice setting.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Breast cancer risk and hysterectomy status: the Multiethnic Cohort study.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Malcolm C Pike; Brian E Henderson; Lynne R Wilkens; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Reproductive factors and colon cancers.

Authors:  R K Peters; M C Pike; W W Chang; T M Mack
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hormone Use, Reproductive History, and Risk of Lung Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Studies.

Authors:  Ann G Schwartz; Roberta M Ray; Michele L Cote; Judith Abrams; Robert J Sokol; Susan L Hendrix; Chu Chen; Rowan T Chlebowski; F Allan Hubbell; Charles Kooperberg; JoAnn E Manson; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Thomas Rohan; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Heather Wakelee; Michael S Simon
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Associations of Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Among Black and White Women: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study, 1993-2001.

Authors:  Whitney R Robinson; Hazel B Nichols; Chiu Kit Tse; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  A Revised Markov Model Evaluating Oophorectomy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: Age 65 Years Revisited.

Authors:  Shannon K Rush; Xiuyu Ma; Michael A Newton; Stephen L Rose
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

4.  Premenopausal gynecologic surgery and survival among black and white women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Mya L Roberson; Hazel B Nichols; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Removal of all ovarian tissue versus conserving ovarian tissue at time of hysterectomy in premenopausal patients with benign disease: study using routine data and data linkage.

Authors:  Jemma Mytton; Felicity Evison; Peter J Chilton; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-02-06

6.  Examining the common aetiology of serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast cancers using double primaries.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Megan S Rice; Emily C Zabor; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Subsequent Development of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Ovarian Surgery for Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Huang; Wen-Hsun Chang; Hsin-Yi Huang; Chao-Yu Guo; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Nicole Huang; Wen-Ling Lee; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.790

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.