Literature DB >> 22087381

Perceptions and Attitudes of Medical Students towards Two Methods of Assessing Practical Anatomy Knowledge.

Ibrahim M Inuwa1, Varna Taranikanti, Maimouna Al-Rawahy, Omar Habbal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, summative practical examination in anatomy takes the form of 'spotters' consisting of a stream of prosections, radiological images and dissections with pins indicating specific structures. Recently, we have started to administer similar examinations online using the quiz facility in Moodle™ (a free, open-source web application for producing modular internet-based courses) in addition to the traditional format. This paper reports on an investigation into students' perceptions of each assessment environment.
METHODS: Over a 3-year period, practical assessment in anatomy was conducted either in traditional format or online via learning management software called Moodle™. All students exposed to the two examination formats at the College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman, were divided into two categories: junior (Year 3) and senior (Year 4). An evaluation of their perception of both examination formats was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of restricted and free response items.
RESULTS: More than half of all students expressed a clear preference for the online environment and believed it was more exam-friendly. This preference was higher amongst senior students. Compared to females, male students preferred the online environment. Senior students were less likely to study on cadavers when the examination was conducted online. Specimen quality, ability to manage time, and seating arrangements were major advantages identified by students who preferred the online format.
CONCLUSION: Computer-based practical examinations in anatomy appeared to be generally popular with our students. The students adopted a different approach to study when the exam was conducted online as compared to the traditional 'steeplechase' format.

Keywords:  Anatomy; Attitude to computers; Medical education

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087381      PMCID: PMC3210049     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J        ISSN: 2075-051X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Using computers for assessment in medicine.

Authors:  Peter Cantillon; Bill Irish; David Sales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-11

2.  Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning?

Authors:  Kalle Romanov; Anne Nevgi
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course.

Authors:  Mike Carbonaro; Sharla King; Elizabeth Taylor; Franziska Satzinger; Fern Snart; Jane Drummond
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  Strategies for reducing test anxiety and optimizing exam preparation in German university students: a prevention-oriented pilot project of the University of Würzburg.

Authors:  Silke Neuderth; Burkhard Jabs; Armin Schmidtke
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Acute medicine teaching in an undergraduate medical curriculum: a blended learning approach.

Authors:  I M Shah; M R Walters; J H McKillop
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Anatomy "steeplechase" online: necessity sometimes is the catalyst for innovation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Muhammad Inuwa; Maimouna Al Rawahy; Varna Taranikanti; Omar Habbal
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual.

Authors:  A P Miller; P Haden; P L Schwartz; E G Loten
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Computer-aided instruction.

Authors:  J A Swets; W Feurzeig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Role of computers in learning--application in formative assessment.

Authors:  A Rattan; S Mittal; A K Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  A pilot study of microcomputer testing in paediatrics.

Authors:  D W Butzin; C P Friedman; R C Brownlee
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  3 in total

1.  "Between a Rock and a Hard Place": The discordant views among medical teachers about anatomy content in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Inuwa; Varna Taranikanti; Maimouna Al-Rawahy; Sadhana Roychoudhry; Omar Habbal
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2012-02-07

2.  Is a Team-based Learning Approach to Anatomy Teaching Superior to Didactic Lecturing?

Authors:  Naghme Ghorbani; Saied Karbalay-Doust; Ali Noorafshan
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-01-27

3.  Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.

Authors:  T Sadeesh; G Prabavathy; Arthi Ganapathy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 1.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.