Literature DB >> 9435721

Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual.

A P Miller1, P Haden, P L Schwartz, E G Loten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test a computer-based method of in-course assessment for a modular, systems-oriented medical curriculum at the University of Otago Medical School.
METHOD: For the in-course assessment in anatomic pathology, 193 students completed five biweekly (i.e., every two weeks), criterion-referenced, computer-based quizzes incorporating many digitized photographs and a variety of question formats. The students signed up to take quizzes at any of ten available times during each quiz week. A score of 70% was required for passing each quiz, but the students could retake quizzes up to two more times in alternative versions. The students' opinions about biweekly testing and computer-based testing were sought.
RESULTS: All 193 students satisfactorily completed the assessment program, with no significant problems with hardware, software, or administration during the more than 1,000 computer-based quizzes. The students valued the bi-weekly quizzes as a stimulus for study and for feedback. They strongly supported computer-based quizzes, identifying a variety of benefits in their responses to the questionnaire. The staff found that development of visually rich quizzes was greatly facilitated by the use of computers.
CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the feasibility of using regular, computer-based quizzes for in-course assessment of a large medical school class and demonstrated assessments of a kind that would be difficult to achieve by means other than with computers.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9435721     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199712000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Perceptions and Attitudes of Medical Students towards Two Methods of Assessing Practical Anatomy Knowledge.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Inuwa; Varna Taranikanti; Maimouna Al-Rawahy; Omar Habbal
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-08-15

3.  Abstracts Presented at the 2005 Spring Meeting of the Society for Education in Anesthesia, Washington, Washington DC.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2005-07-01

4.  Does medical students' preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance?

Authors:  Achim Hochlehnert; Konstantin Brass; Andreas Moeltner; Jana Juenger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.