| Literature DB >> 22084718 |
Daljit Singh Arora1, Priyanka Chandra.
Abstract
The antioxidant activity of Aspergillus fumigatus was assayed by different procedures and correlated with its extracellular total phenolic contents. Different physio-chemical parameters were optimized to enhance the activity. The culture grown under stationary conditions for 10 days at 25°C at pH 7 gave the best antioxidant activity. Statistical approaches demonstrated sucrose and NaNO(3) to be the most suitable carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. Response surface analysis showed 5% sucrose, 0.05% NaNO(3), and incubation temperature of 35°C to be the optimal conditions for best expression of antioxidant activity. Under these conditions, the antioxidant potential assayed through different procedures was 89.8%, 70.1%, and 70.2% scavenging effect for DPPH radical, ferrous ion and nitric oxide ion, respectively. The reducing power showed an absorbance of 1.0 and FRAP assay revealed the activity of 60.5%. Extracellular total phenolic content and antioxidant activity as assayed by different procedures positively correlated.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22084718 PMCID: PMC3198597 DOI: 10.5402/2011/619395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharmacol ISSN: 2090-5165
Effect of various carbon sources on antioxidant potential of Aspergillus fumigatus.
| % activity | Dextrose | Maltose | Lactose | Starch | Glycerol | Sucrose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH* assay | 62.2 ± 0.06 | 60.8 ± 0.5 | 50.6 ± 0.4 | 56.7 ± 0.4 | 32.9 ± 0.2 | 68.96 ± 0.47 |
| Reducing power | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.16 ± 0.4 | 0.510 ± 00 |
| Fe2+ scavenging activity | 45.3 ± 0.9 | 42.1 ± 0.08 | 35.3 ± 0.1 | 40.3 ± 0.55 | 24.3 ± 0.5 | 48.3 ± 0.3 |
| FRAP** assay | 40.7 ± 0.2 | 38.8 ± 0.09 | 32.9 ± 0.2 | 35.4 ± 0.3 | 25.6 ± 0.5 | 45.2 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||||
| NO*** scavenging activity | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 30 min | 24.6 ± 0.2 | 23.8 ± 0.1 | 12.5 ± 0.4 | 16.7 ± 0.01 | 10.3 ± 0.2 | 28.2 ± 0.7 |
| 60 min | 30.2 ± 0.3 | 30.5 ± 0.4 | 18.4 ± 0.02 | 22.6 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.5 | 35.2 ± 0.02 |
| 90 min | 38.3 ± 0.1 | 34.2 ± 0.6 | 21.8 ± 0.2 | 26.8 ± 0.02 | 20.4 ± 0.8 | 40.2 ± 0.8 |
| 120 min | 40.3 ± 0.1 | 38.6 ± 0.1 | 26.3 ± 0.2 | 30.2 ± 0.4 | 25.5 ± 0.3 | 45.3 ± 0.11 |
| 180 min | 45.3 ± 0.02 | 40.8 ± 0.02 | 30.8 ± 0.5 | 35.2 ± 0.88 | 28.9 ± 0.32 | 50.2 ± 0.45 |
| TPC**** (mg/mL) | 4.2 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.07 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.7 | 5.68 ± 0.03 |
| Biomass (mg) | 35.4 ± 0.2 | 30.4 ± 0.04 | 20.6 ± 0.06 | 26.7 ± 0.3 | 12.6 ± 0.02 | 40.8 ± 0.3 |
*DPPH: 1.1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl; **FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; ***NO: nitric oxide; ****TPC: total phenolic content; values are means of three replicates ± S.D.
Effect of various nitrogen sources on antioxidant potential of Aspergillus fumigatus.
| Antioxidant activity (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen sources | DPPH* assay | Reducing power | Fe2+ scavenging activity | FRAP** assay | NO*** scavenging activity | TPC**** (mg/mL) | Biomass (mg) |
| Nitrogen rich organic supplements | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Yeast extract | 65.8 ± 0.6 | 0.48 ± 0.7 | 42.7 ± 0.1 | 40.2 ± 0.3 | 30.7 ± 0.04 | 34.8 ± 0.3 | 38.8 ± 0.04 |
| Peptone | 65.8 ± 0.5 | 0.463 ± 0.6 | 42.3 ± 0.2 | 40.1 ± 0.2 | 30.1 ± 0.6 | 35.2 ± 0.2 | 37.6 ± 0.06 |
| Malt extract | 58.3 ± 0.5 | 0.35 ± 0.3 | 37.8 ± 0.5 | 35.6 ± 0.01 | 25.7 ± 0.2 | 30.5 ± 0.3 | 35.8 ± 0.5 |
| Casein | 60.3 ± 0.07 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 40.5 ± 0.4 | 37.7 ± 0.6 | 22.8 ± 0.4 | 31.9 ± 0.5 | 35.7 ± 0.2 |
| Soyabean meal | 52.3 ± 0.5 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 35.2 ± 0.5 | 32.7 ± 0.02 | 20.7 ± 0.02 | 25.4 ± 0.1 | 28.7 ± 0.5 |
| Urea | 20.4 ± 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 8.6 ± 0.04 |
|
| |||||||
| Inorganic nitrogen sources | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| KNO3 | 45.2 ± 0.05 | 0.302 ± 0.01 | 28.5 ± 0.6 | 25.7 ± 0.03 | 15.8 ± 0.05 | 17.8 ± 0.04 | 20.6 ± 0.78 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 46.7 ± 0.03 | 0.320 ± 0.5 | 28.9 ± 0.5 | 26.7 ± 0.5 | 15.3 ± 0.1 | 28.9 ± 0.1 | 20.7 ± 0.6 |
| (NH4)HSO4 | 40.3 ± 0.06 | 0.206 ± 0.1 | 25.3 ± 0.03 | 22.8 ± 0.7 | 10.3 ± 0.2 | 18.9 ± 0.1 | 20.8 ± 0.3 |
| NH4NO3 | 36.2 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 24.5 ± 0.1 | 21.9 ± 0.8 | 10.8 ± 0.5 | 12.8 ± 0.2 | 18.6 ± 0.4 |
| NaNO3 | 68.9 ± 0.4 | 0.510 ± 00 | 48.3 ± 0.3 | 45.2 ± 0.22 | 28.2 ± 0.7 | 35.2 ± 0.02 | 40.2 ± 0.8 |
| NH4Cl | 50.3 ± 0.7 | 0.26 ± 0.5 | 30.2 ± 0.1 | 28.6 ± 0.3 | 16.9 ± 0.2 | 20.6 ± 0.3 | 25.7 ± 0.1 |
*DPPH: 1.1-diphenyl: 2-picryl hydrazyl; **FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; ***NO: nitric oxide; ****TPC: total phenolic content; values are means of three replicates ± S.D.
Plackett-Burman design variables with antioxidant potential of Aspergillus fumigates.
| Variables (%) | Antioxidant activity (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | Sucrose | NaNO3 | K2HPO4 | MgSO4 | KCl | DPPH* assay | Reducing power | Fe2+scavenging activity | FRAP** assay | NO*** scavenging activity | TPC**** (mg/mL) |
| 1 | 5.0 | 0.000 | 0.18 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 58.1 | 0.48 | 44.3 | 45.7 | 48.30 | 4.80 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 0.350 | 0.00 | 0.090 | 0.000 | 65.4 | 0.72 | 48.1 | 50.3 | 52.30 | 5.80 |
| 3 | 0.0 | 0.350 | 0.18 | 0.000 | 0.090 | 25.3 | 0.20 | 20.3 | 25.6 | 28.20 | 1.80 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 0.000 | 0.18 | 0.090 | 0.000 | 50.3 | 0.40 | 40.9 | 42.1 | 45.30 | 4.80 |
| 5 | 5.0 | 0.350 | 0.00 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 72.1 | 0.63 | 54.2 | 56.3 | 60.20 | 6.20 |
| 6 | 5.0 | 0.350 | 0.18 | 0.000 | 0.090 | 65.4 | 0.55 | 48.3 | 50.6 | 55.60 | 5.30 |
| 7 | 0.0 | 0.350 | 0.18 | 0.090 | 0.000 | 23.4 | 0.19 | 18.6 | 20.3 | 25.40 | 1.40 |
| 8 | 0.0 | 0.000 | 0.18 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 48.2 | 0.36 | 37.3 | 40.1 | 45.20 | 4.00 |
| 9 | 0.0 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 20.8 | 0.11 | 15.2 | 17.2 | 20.20 | 1.01 |
| 10 | 5.0 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.090 | 60.3 | 0.50 | 46.2 | 45.3 | 48.30 | 5.00 |
| 11 | 0.0 | 0.350 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 54.3 | 0.45 | 42.1 | 40.2 | 45.03 | 4.50 |
| 12 | 0.0 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 0.175 | 0.09 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 69.2 | 0.58 | 49.0 | 47.2 | 52.20 | 6.00 |
| 14 | 2.5 | 0.175 | 0.09 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 68.4 | 0.57 | 48.2 | 47.1 | 52.10 | 6.10 |
*DPPH: 1.1-diphenyl -2-picryl hydrazyl; **FRAP: Ferric reducing antioxidant power; ***NO: nitric oxide; ****TPC: total phenolic content.
Box-Behnken designs of different variables with antioxidant potential of Aspergillus fumigates.
| Variables (%) | Antioxidant activity (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | Sucrose | NaNO3 | Temperature | DPPH Assay | Reducing power | Fe2+ scavenging activity | FRAP assay | NO scavenging activity | TPC (mg/mL) |
| 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 25 | 52.3 | 0.42 | 38.4 | 35.3 | 41.8 | 4.6 |
| 2 | 5 | 0.05 | 25 | 77.8 | 0.81 | 62.3 | 60.2 | 65.2 | 10.3 |
| 3 | 1 | 0.35 | 25 | 78.1 | 0.83 | 64.4 | 65.4 | 68.1 | 10.9 |
| 4 | 5 | 0.35 | 25 | 42.3 | 0.42 | 28.1 | 25.3 | 30.1 | 2.9 |
| 5 | 1 | 0.20 | 15 | 45.4 | 0.48 | 30.4 | 28.2 | 32.4 | 3.1 |
| 6 | 5 | 0.20 | 15 | 47.8 | 0.48 | 32.3 | 30.3 | 35.2 | 3.8 |
| 7 | 1 | 0.20 | 35 | 69.2 | 0.63 | 50.1 | 48.3 | 52.4 | 6.1 |
| 8 | 5 | 0.20 | 35 | 78.0 | 0.89 | 62.4 | 60.1 | 65.3 | 10.2 |
| 9 | 3 | 0.05 | 15 | 70.5 | 0.71 | 50.2 | 50.2 | 53.2 | 6.2 |
| 10 | 3 | 0.35 | 15 | 69.3 | 0.62 | 50.8 | 49.2 | 53.3 | 6.0 |
| 11 | 3 | 0.05 | 35 | 76.4 | 0.78 | 56.2 | 54.3 | 59.3 | 6.9 |
| 12 | 3 | 0.35 | 35 | 74.2 | 0.72 | 54.3 | 51.2 | 56.4 | 6.4 |
| 13 | 3 | 0.20 | 25 | 69.0 | 0.59 | 50.1 | 45.3 | 52.6 | 5.8 |
| 14 | 3 | 0.20 | 25 | 68.8 | 0.61 | 50.2 | 46.3 | 52.1 | 5.8 |
| 15 | 3 | 0.20 | 25 | 69.3 | 0.58 | 48.3 | 46.2 | 50.1 | 6.1 |
| 16 | 3 | 0.20 | 25 | 69.8 | 0.62 | 48.2 | 47.2 | 52.4 | 6.0 |
| 17 | 3 | 0.20 | 25 | 68.9 | 0.51 | 48.3 | 45.2 | 50.2 | 5.7 |
Figure 1Contour graph showing effect of different variables on antioxidant potential (% activity) as assayed by different procedures (a) 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl free radical (DPPH) assay (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate); (b) reducing power (in absorbance) (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate); (c) ferrous ion scavenging activity (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate); (d) nitric oxide ion scavenging activity (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate); (e) FRAP assay (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate); (f) total phenolic content (mg/mL) (hold value: 0.05% of sodium nitrate).