| Literature DB >> 26141525 |
Harpreet Kaur1, Jemimah Gesare Onsare, Vishal Sharma, Daljit Singh Arora.
Abstract
Fungus isolated from soil has been evaluated for its antimicrobial activity which showed broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against all the pathogenic microorganisms used. Optimization was done by response surface methodology (RSM) to further optimize the medium which could further enhance the antimicrobial activity by 1.1-1.9 folds. Column chromatography was used to isolate the active compound which was characterized to be by various spectroscopic techniques such NMR, IR and LCMS and it was found to be apparently novel compound 7-methoxy-2,2-dimethyl-4-octa-4',6'-dienyl-2 H -napthalene-1-one. MIC of the active compound ranged from (0.5-15 µg/mL which was found to be comparable with the standard antibiotics. Viable cell count studies of the active compound showed it to be bactericidal in nature. Further, the compound when tested for its biosafety was found neither to be cytotoxic nor mutagenic. Cytotoxicity studies of the compound on cancer cell lines showed a valuable cytotoxic potential against all tested human cancer cell lines. Further, the compound induces apoptosis in lung cancer (A549) cells reveled by increase the distribution of nuclear DNA in Sub G1 phase as observed in flow cytometry. The study demonstrated that an apparently novel compound isolated from Penicillium sp. seems to be a stable and potent antimicrobial.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26141525 PMCID: PMC4492345 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-015-0120-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Figure 1a Contour plot of Staphylococcus aureus. b Contour plot of Staphylococcus epidermidis. c Contour plot of Klebsiella pneumoniae 1. d Contour plot of MRSA. e Contour plot of C. albicans.
Result of Box–Benhken design experiment for antimicrobial activity of Penicillium sp
| Std. | Dextrose | Starch | Yeast extract |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/100 mL) | Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||||||
| 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 15 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 27 | 28 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 20 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 17 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 34 | 36 | 28 | 32 | 27 |
| 5 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 6 | 1.25 | 2 | 0.2 | 40 | 41 | 30 | 34 | 30 |
| 7 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 21 | 25 | 16 | 18 | 18 |
| 8 | 1.25 | 2 | 0.8 | 30 | 32 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| 9 | 0.5 | 1.25 | 0.2 | 30 | 30 | 14 | 17 | 15 |
| 10 | 2 | 1.25 | 0.2 | 25 | 26 | 16 | 18 | 17 |
| 11 | 0.5 | 1.25 | 0.8 | 22 | 20 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 12 | 2 | 1.25 | 0.8 | 25 | 20 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 13 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 33 | 34 | 16 | 17 | 16 |
| 14 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 30 | 28 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| 15 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 32 | 33 | 16 | 18 | 17 |
| 16 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 35 | 33 | 16 | 18 | 16 |
| 17 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 32 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 16 |
Comparison of MIC of butanolic extract and pure compound with two standard antibiotics
| Microorganisms | MIC butanolic extract | MIC of compound | MIC of gentamicin | MIC of amphotericin B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.1c | 2b | 1a | ND |
|
| 0.2c | 2b | 1a | ND |
|
| 0.1c | 1b | 0.19a | ND |
|
| 0.2b | 1a | ND | ND |
|
| 0.5c | 5b | 0.19a | 99d |
|
| 1b | ND | 10a | ND |
|
| 0.7c | 5b | 2a | ND |
|
| 5b | ND | 2a | ND |
|
| 5b | ND | 10a | ND |
|
| 10b | ND | 1a | ND |
|
| 15b | ND | 1a | ND |
|
| 20b | ND | 1a | ND |
The values represents mean of three values, different lower case letters (a–c) show statistical significant (P ≤ 0.05) difference between columns.
Figure 2Time kill studies of butanolic extract of Penicillium sp.
Figure 3Time kill studies of purified compound.
Figure 4Post antibiotic effect of the butanolic extract and pure compound.
Percentage growth inhibition against different cancer cell lines
| Compounds | Conc (µg/mL) | A549 | THP-1 | PC-3 | Colo-205 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | Leukemia | Prostate | Colon | ||
| KB14 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 5 | 28 | 10 | 27 | 20 | |
| 10 | 31 | 22 | 38 | 39 | |
| 30 | 55 | 39 | 45 | 50 | |
| 50 | 75 | 65 | 70 | 72 | |
| IC50 | 28 | >50 | 31 | 35 | |
| 5-FU | 1 | 72 | 74 | – | – |
| Adriamycin | 1 | 67 | 70 | – | 80 |
| Mitomycin-c | 1 | – | 67 | 71 | – |
Figure 5Overview of flowcytometric analysis of nuclear DNA.
Figure 6Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA treated compound and the standard.
Figure 77-Methoxy-2,2-dimethyl-4-octa-4′,6′-dienyl-2H-napthalene-1-one.