Literature DB >> 2208012

Mammographic screening of women with increased risk of breast cancer.

V G Vogel1, D S Graves, S W Vernon, J A Lord, R J Winn, G N Peters.   

Abstract

Five hundred one women from Dallas County, Texas who participated in the American Cancer Society 1987 Texas Breast Screening Project were selected because of a self-reported family history of breast cancer (cases). They were matched with 501 randomly selected women from the same county with no family history (controls). Although there was a statistically significant trend with age for an increasing proportion of women to report having undergone mammography, there was no significant difference when comparing mammographic histories of cases with controls after controlling for age (31.5% versus 35.1%, P = 0.33). Significantly more cases (79%) perceived their risk for breast cancer to be moderate or greater compared with controls (54%, P less than 0.0001), but mammographic histories were not different when controlling for perceived risk. Both cases and controls cited lack of physician referral and cost as their reasons for not having undergone mammography. Women at increased risk for breast cancer (because of their family history) are not undergoing regular mammographic screening despite their self-awareness of the increase in their risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2208012     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901001)66:7<1613::aid-cncr2820660728>3.0.co;2-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Screening behaviors among relatives of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  V G Vogel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Predictors of Breast Cancer Worry in a Hispanic and Predominantly Immigrant Mammography Screening Population.

Authors:  Ayana April-Sanders; Sabine Oskar; Rachel C Shelton; Karen M Schmitt; Elise Desperito; Angeline Protacio; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Lynne Pahl; Melinda Begeman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 5.  Clinical management of women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  V G Vogel; A Yeomans; E Higginbotham
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; M L Bondy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Mammography and physician breast exams after the diagnosis of breast cancer in a twin or non-twin sister.

Authors:  J L Richardson; K Danley; G T Mondrus; D Deapen; T Mack
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; R Harris; S C Kobrin; C S Skinner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.