Literature DB >> 7769467

Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening.

M W Kreuter1, V J Strecher, R Harris, S C Kobrin, C S Skinner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of physician gender on rates of Pap testing, mammography, and cholesterol testing when identifying and adjusting for demographic, psychosocial, and other patient variables known to influence screening rates.
DESIGN: A prospective design with baseline and six-month follow-up assessments of patients' screening status.
SETTING: Twelve community-based group family practice medicine offices in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: 1,850 adult patients, aged 18-75 years (six-month response rate, 83%), each of whom identified one of 37 physicians as being his or her regular care provider. MAIN
RESULTS: Where screening was indicated at baseline, the patients of the women physicians were 47% more likely to get a Pap test [odds ratio (OR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05, 2.04] and 56% more likely to get a cholesterol test (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.24) during the study period than were the patients of the men physicians. For mammography, the younger patients (aged 35-39 years) of the women physicians were screened at a much higher rate than were the younger patients of the men physicians (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 0.98, 7.34); however, at older ages, the patients of the women and the men physicians had similar rates of screening.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, the patients of the women physicians were screened at a higher rate than were the patients of the men physicians, even after adjusting for important patient variables. These findings were not limited to gender-specific screening activities (e.g., Pap testing), as in some previous studies. However, the patients of the women physicians were aggressively screened for breast cancer at the youngest ages, where there is little evidence of benefit from mammography. Larger studies are needed to determine whether this pattern of effects reflects a broader phenomenon in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7769467     DOI: 10.1007/BF02599664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  33 in total

1.  Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.

Authors:  V L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

2.  How valid are mammography self-reports?

Authors:  E S King; B K Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

4.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; C E Dube; B H Marcus; J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Female medical practitioners. More preventive and patient oriented?

Authors:  B Maheux; F Dufort; F Béland; A Jacques; A Lévesque
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  National trends in the use of preventive health care by women.

Authors:  D M Makuc; V M Freid; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status.

Authors:  W F Velicer; C C DiClemente; J O Prochaska; N Brandenburg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-05

8.  Cancer screening by primary care physicians. Can we explain the differences?

Authors:  E H Osborn; J A Bird; S J McPhee; J E Rodnick; D Fordham
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Sex differences in patients' and physicians' communication during primary care medical visits.

Authors:  D Roter; M Lipkin; A Korsgaard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  30 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

2.  Women's health care: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  S D Gharib; J A Manson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Utilization of outpatient diagnostic imaging. Does the physician's gender play a role?

Authors:  M P Rosen; R B Davis; L G Lesky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Primary care residents' characteristics and motives for providing differential medical treatment of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Elva M Arredondo; Kathryn I Pollak; Philip Costanzo; Maya McNeilly; Evan Myers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Delivery of primary care to women. Do women's health centers do it better?

Authors:  E A Phelan; W Burke; R A Deyo; T D Koepsell; A Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A comparison of the preventive health care provided by women's health centers and general internal medicine practices.

Authors:  L H Harpole; E A Mort; K M Freund; J Orav; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cancer preventive screening: a cross-border comparison of United States and Canadian Chinese women.

Authors:  Shin-Ping Tu; Sara L Jackson; Yutaka Yasui; Michéle Deschamps; T Gregory Hislop; Vicky M Taylor
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  The Influence of Patient Race and Socioeconomic Status and Resident Physician Gender and Specialty on Preventive Screening.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Semin Med Pract       Date:  2008-01-01

10.  Does Provider Gender Affect the Quality of Primary Care?

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Amy Farkas; Cecilia Scholcoff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.