Literature DB >> 8318641

Mammography and physician breast exams after the diagnosis of breast cancer in a twin or non-twin sister.

J L Richardson1, K Danley, G T Mondrus, D Deapen, T Mack.   

Abstract

Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8318641     DOI: 10.1007/bf00051320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  26 in total

1.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

2.  Breast cancer screening and education in high risk women.

Authors:  R Dworsky; A Paganini-Hill; D Spicer
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1989

3.  Provisional estimates from the National Health Interview Survey Supplement on Cancer Control--United States, January-March 1987.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey: United States, 1982.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  1985-09

5.  Comparison of the number of breast-cancer deaths observed in relatives of breast-cancer patients, and the number expected on the basis of mortality rates.

Authors:  M T MACKLIN
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Familial breast cancer in a population-based series.

Authors:  R Ottman; M C Pike; M C King; J T Casagrande; B E Henderson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Family history of breast cancer as a risk indicator for the disease.

Authors:  C Bain; F E Speizer; B Rosner; C Belanger; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

9.  Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Krischer; B Cook; R S Weiner
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1988

10.  Using a state cancer registry to increase screening behaviors of sisters and daughters of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P S Houts; S L Wojtkowiak; M A Simmonds; G B Weinberg; D F Heitjan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.