Literature DB >> 22079763

Different effects of multiple health status indicators on breast and colorectal cancer screening in a nationally representative US sample.

Anjali D Deshpande1, Amy McQueen, Elliot J Coups.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent associations between multiple health status indicators and breast and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in a national US sample. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) involved 5115 men and 7100 women aged 50 years and older. MEASURES: Health status indicators included: self-reported perceived health status, number of chronic conditions, and functional limitation due to a chronic condition. Individuals were considered adherent to CRCS guidelines if they reported having a home-based fecal occult blood test in the past year or endoscopy in the past 10 years. Women were adherent to breast cancer screening guidelines if they reported having a mammogram in the previous 2 years. Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software to account for the complex sampling of the NHIS survey. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between each of the health status indicators and screening adherence for CRCS and mammography and to calculate estimated screening rates.
RESULTS: The three health status indicators were independently and differentially associated with screening adherence. Poor perceived health was associated with lower mammography among women, whereas a greater number of chronic conditions were consistently associated with greater screening. In adjusted analyses, functional limitation was only significantly associated with greater CRCS among women.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses included three common indicators of health status and provide new evidence of their complex associations with cancer screening. Future studies must examine the mechanisms by which these indicators influence screening recommendations and adherence among older adults over time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079763      PMCID: PMC3292673          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  32 in total

1.  Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003).

Authors:  William Rakowski; Helen Meissner; Sally W Vernon; Nancy Breen; Barbara Rimer; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Comorbidity as a predictor of stage of illness for patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Holly G Pursley; Beth Newman; Dmitri Pavlov; Kun Chen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in young patients with poor health and severe comorbidity.

Authors:  Shahnaz Sultan; Jason Conway; David Edelman; Tara Dudley; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

4.  Prevalence and correlates of recent and repeat mammography among California women ages 55-79.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Roberta Wyn; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Does patient health and hysterectomy status influence cervical cancer screening in older women?

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Jasmin A Tiro; David Haggstrom; Grace Lu-Yao; Nancy Breen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Laura C Seeff; Trevor D Thompson; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Karla Lindquist; Sean Nugent; Tammy Schult; Sei J Lee; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening?

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Gary L Smith; Gillian Haber; Michael C Belcon
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

9.  Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Joseph Galanko; Tara K Dudley; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Mika Nagamine; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  20 in total

1.  Patient and provider perspectives on the relationship between multiple morbidity management and disease prevention.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Shoshana H Bardach; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-09-17

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis: An Understudied Issue in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Authors:  Nicole E Rich; Neehar D Parikh; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 6.115

3.  The relationship between perceived burden of chronic conditions and colorectal cancer screening among Appalachian residents.

Authors:  Yelena N Tarasenko; Steven T Fleming; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The relationship between four health-related quality-of-life indicators and use of mammography and Pap test screening in US women.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Rural-urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn E Weaver; Ann M Geiger; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Jeah Kyoungrae Jung
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Utilization of screening mammography in older women according to comorbidity and age: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Demb; Isabel Allen; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-04

10.  Comorbidity Profiles and Lung Cancer Screening among Older Adults: U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2017-2019.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Dongyu Zhang; Martin Tammemagi; Tomi Akinyemiju; Michael K Gould; Gerard A Silvestri; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.