Anjali D Deshpande1, Amy McQueen, Elliot J Coups. 1. Division of Health Behavior Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. adeshpan@dom.wustl.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent associations between multiple health status indicators and breast and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in a national US sample. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) involved 5115 men and 7100 women aged 50 years and older. MEASURES: Health status indicators included: self-reported perceived health status, number of chronic conditions, and functional limitation due to a chronic condition. Individuals were considered adherent to CRCS guidelines if they reported having a home-based fecal occult blood test in the past year or endoscopy in the past 10 years. Women were adherent to breast cancer screening guidelines if they reported having a mammogram in the previous 2 years. Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software to account for the complex sampling of the NHIS survey. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between each of the health status indicators and screening adherence for CRCS and mammography and to calculate estimated screening rates. RESULTS: The three health status indicators were independently and differentially associated with screening adherence. Poor perceived health was associated with lower mammography among women, whereas a greater number of chronic conditions were consistently associated with greater screening. In adjusted analyses, functional limitation was only significantly associated with greater CRCS among women. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses included three common indicators of health status and provide new evidence of their complex associations with cancer screening. Future studies must examine the mechanisms by which these indicators influence screening recommendations and adherence among older adults over time.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent associations between multiple health status indicators and breast and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in a national US sample. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) involved 5115 men and 7100 women aged 50 years and older. MEASURES: Health status indicators included: self-reported perceived health status, number of chronic conditions, and functional limitation due to a chronic condition. Individuals were considered adherent to CRCS guidelines if they reported having a home-based fecal occult blood test in the past year or endoscopy in the past 10 years. Women were adherent to breast cancer screening guidelines if they reported having a mammogram in the previous 2 years. Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software to account for the complex sampling of the NHIS survey. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between each of the health status indicators and screening adherence for CRCS and mammography and to calculate estimated screening rates. RESULTS: The three health status indicators were independently and differentially associated with screening adherence. Poor perceived health was associated with lower mammography among women, whereas a greater number of chronic conditions were consistently associated with greater screening. In adjusted analyses, functional limitation was only significantly associated with greater CRCS among women. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses included three common indicators of health status and provide new evidence of their complex associations with cancer screening. Future studies must examine the mechanisms by which these indicators influence screening recommendations and adherence among older adults over time.
Authors: William Rakowski; Helen Meissner; Sally W Vernon; Nancy Breen; Barbara Rimer; Melissa A Clark Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jean A Shapiro; Laura C Seeff; Trevor D Thompson; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Louise C Walter; Karla Lindquist; Sean Nugent; Tammy Schult; Sei J Lee; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Mika Nagamine; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shailesh Advani; Dongyu Zhang; Martin Tammemagi; Tomi Akinyemiju; Michael K Gould; Gerard A Silvestri; Dejana Braithwaite Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2021-11