Literature DB >> 19349631

Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans.

Louise C Walter1, Karla Lindquist, Sean Nugent, Tammy Schult, Sei J Lee, Michele A Casadei, Melissa R Partin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration, the American Cancer Society, and the American Geriatrics Society recommend colorectal cancer screening for older adults unless they are unlikely to live 5 years or have significant comorbidity that would preclude treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether colorectal cancer screening is targeted to healthy older patients and is avoided in older patients with severe comorbidity who have life expectancies of 5 years or less.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Durham, North Carolina; Portland, Oregon; and West Los Angeles, California, with linked national VA and Medicare administrative claims. PATIENTS: 27 068 patients 70 years or older who had an outpatient visit at 1 of 4 VA medical centers in 2001 or 2002 and were due for screening. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was receipt of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema in 2001 or 2002, on the basis of national VA and Medicare claims. Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores at the start of 2001 were used to stratify patients into 3 groups ranging from no comorbidity (score of 0) to severe comorbidity (score > or =4), and 5-year mortality was determined for each group.
RESULTS: 46% of patients were screened from 2001 through 2002. Only 47% of patients with no comorbidity were screened despite having life expectancies greater than 5 years (5-year mortality, 19%). Although the incidence of screening decreased with age and worsening comorbidity, it was still 41% for patients with severe comorbidity who had life expectancies less than 5 years (5-year mortality, 55%). The number of VA outpatient visits predicted screening independent of comorbidity, such that patients with severe comorbidity and 4 or more visits had screening rates similar to or higher than those of healthier patients with fewer visits. LIMITATIONS: Some tests may have been performed for nonscreening reasons. The generalizability of findings to persons who do not use the VA system is uncertain.
CONCLUSION: Advancing age was inversely associated with colorectal cancer screening, whereas comorbidity was a weaker predictor. More attention to comorbidity is needed to better target screening to older patients with substantial life expectancies and avoid screening older patients with limited life expectancies. primary funding source: VA Health Services Research and Development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19349631      PMCID: PMC3769097          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

1.  Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Jonathan B Perlin; Kenneth W Kizer; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; J Lee Hargraves; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination?

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Yong Cai; Noel S Weiss; Joann G Elmore; Roy E Pardee; Robert J Reid; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

5.  PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Daniel Bertenthal; Karla Lindquist; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Health status and mammography use among older women.

Authors:  R C Burack; J G Gurney; A M McDaniel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  73 in total

1.  Different effects of multiple health status indicators on breast and colorectal cancer screening in a nationally representative US sample.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Amy McQueen; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Jason S Mathias; Dana Gossett; David W Baker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Implementation of electronic medical records: effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver; Jan Barnsley; Richard H Glazier; Rahim Moineddin; Bart J Harvey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Endoscopist Specialty Predicts the Likelihood of Recommending Cessation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Joseph C Anderson; Christina M Robinson; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Health services research is translational: lessons learned from VHA-funded research on cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  Louise C Walter
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Protective association of colonoscopy against proximal and distal colon cancer and patterns in interval cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Erin E Conners; Kenneth R McQuaid; Sara Epstein; James C Ryan; Janak N Shah; John Inadomi; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Patient and provider perspectives on the relationship between multiple morbidity management and disease prevention.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Shoshana H Bardach; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-09-17

8.  Every patient is an individual: clinicians balance individual factors when discussing prognosis with diverse frail elderly adults.

Authors:  Julie N Thai; Louise C Walter; Catherine Eng; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  A pilot study to examine colorectal cancer screening in two assisted living communities.

Authors:  Kathryn L Moore; Carmen L Lewis; Sheryl Zimmerman; Kimberly Ward; David Reed; Robert Rodriguez; Christine E Kistler
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Physician decision making for colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Denise Esserman; Christopher DeLeon; Michael P Pignone; Donald E Pathman; Carol Golin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.