Literature DB >> 17119033

Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003).

William Rakowski1, Helen Meissner, Sally W Vernon, Nancy Breen, Barbara Rimer, Melissa A Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most national-level mammography data are for ever-had and most-recent screening. There are few national-level data on rates of repeat, on-schedule mammography, and on the prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography. It is also important to investigate the similarity of correlates for repeat and recent mammography.
METHODS: Analyses were from data for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information and National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003; N = 1,581). The two dependent variables were self-report of repeat mammography (two exams on schedule, based on an every-other-year interval) and recent mammography only (one mammogram within the past 2 years).
RESULTS: The prevalence of recent mammography was 81.6% (95% confidence interval, 79.1-84.1) and for repeat mammography was 72.2% (95% confidence interval, 69.0-75.4). An access to care variable combining insurance coverage and regular source of care was the strongest sociodemographic correlate of both mammography indicators. Most other sociodemographic variables were not associated with mammography status. Five psychosocial/behavioral variables were associated with both mammography indicators (smoking status, attention to health information, knowledge of screening interval, worry about breast cancer, and recent mood status). Correlates were very similar for repeat and recent mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Although access to care had the strongest association with mammography, psychosocial and behavioral variables did better as a group than the sociodemographic variables. A standard set of such variables should be considered for all national surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119033     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  49 in total

1.  Different effects of multiple health status indicators on breast and colorectal cancer screening in a nationally representative US sample.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Amy McQueen; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Vickie L Shavers; Levi Ross; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-08

3.  Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Jong-Eun Lee; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Youngshin Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; J Michael Bowling; Noel T Brewer; Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; Tara S Strigo; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Papanicolaou testing among women in the southern United States.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Harvey J Murff; Yong Cui; Margaret Hargreaves; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Cancer screening practices of adult survivors of retinoblastoma at risk of second cancers.

Authors:  Victoria Sheen; Margaret A Tucker; David H Abramson; Johanna M Seddon; Ruth A Kleinerman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Xiaozhong Wen; Victoria Wilcox; Kate McCarthy-Barnett; Jeanne Panarace; Carol Manning; Susan Allen; William Rakowski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-09-23

9.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 10.  A meta-analysis of interventions to promote mammography among ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jong-Eun Lee; Jiyun Kim; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.