Literature DB >> 19111790

Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening?

Nasar U Ahmed1, Gary L Smith, Gillian Haber, Michael C Belcon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Women with functional limitations face obstacles in adhering to established mammography guidelines owing to personal factors and barriers within the health care system. Whereas some studies have focused on either physical or cognitive limitations that correlate with lower rates of cancer screening, this study examined multiple functional limitations (physical, psychological, and sociability) and mammography screening.
METHODS: Data from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed for 9,505 women aged > or =40 years. We hypothesized that women with functional limitations (physical, psychological, and/or sociability) are less likely to receive screening mammography. Access variables (insurance coverage and usual source of health care) and utilization variables (physician contact and receipt of clinical breast examination) were included. Using multiple logistic regression (MLR), we estimated the relative contribution of functional limitations on mammography use after accounting for sociodemographic characteristics and confounding variables.
RESULTS: An estimated 34.6% of women had physical limitations, 16.1% sociability limitations, and 8.1% psychological limitations. After controlling for all other variables, MLR analysis indicated that women with moderate or severe sociability limitations were less likely than their unimpaired counterparts to utilize mammography (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.81). Interestingly, women with severe physical limitations were more likely than physically able women to utilize mammography screening (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.53). Women with no insurance, no usual care, and no doctor's visit within the past year were substantially less likely to use mammography screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Sociability limitations, lack of access to health care, and limited regular checkups played significant roles in underutilization of screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19111790     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  10 in total

1.  Different effects of multiple health status indicators on breast and colorectal cancer screening in a nationally representative US sample.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Amy McQueen; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Complex Multimorbidity and Breast Cancer Screening Among Midlife and Older Women: The Role of Perceived Need.

Authors:  David F Warner; Siran M Koroukian; Nicholas K Schiltz; Kathleen A Smyth; Gregory S Cooper; Cynthia Owusu; Kurt C Stange; Nathan A Berger
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

3.  Mammography adherence in relation to function-related indicators in older women.

Authors:  Dongyu Zhang; Linn Abraham; Brian L Sprague; Tracy Onega; Shailesh Advani; Joshua Demb; Diana L Miglioretti; Louise M Henderson; Karen J Wernli; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; John T Schousboe; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Xiaozhong Wen; Victoria Wilcox; Kate McCarthy-Barnett; Jeanne Panarace; Carol Manning; Susan Allen; William Rakowski
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-09-23

5.  Psychosocial correlates of cervical cancer screening among older Hispanic women.

Authors:  Tamara J Cadet; Kathleen Stewart; Tenial Howard
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2016-12-14

6.  Adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for breast and cervical cancer screening for women who have a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xinling Xu; Joshua R Mann; James W Hardin; Erin Gustafson; Suzanne W McDermott; Chelsea B Deroche
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Factors affecting the development of adverse drug reactions (Review article).

Authors:  Muaed Jamal Alomar
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Attending to the Psychosocial Needs of Older Hispanic, Black and Non-Hispanic White Women and Their Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors.

Authors:  Tamara Cadet; Shanna L Burke; Louanne Bakk; Frances R Nedjat-Haiem; Tracy Schroepfer
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 2.739

9.  Associations Between Disability and Breast or Cervical Cancers, Accounting for Screening Disparities.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Nicole D Agaronnik; Areej El-Jawahri
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.178

10.  Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Demb; Tomi Akinyemiju; Isabel Allen; Tracy Onega; Robert A Hiatt; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.458

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.