Literature DB >> 22079538

Characterisation of the cell suspension harvested from the dermal epidermal junction using a ReCell® kit.

Fiona M Wood1, Natalie Giles, Andrew Stevenson, Suzanne Rea, Mark Fear.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of non-cultured autologous cells to promote wound healing and in reconstructive procedures is increasing. One common method for preparing these cells is the use of the ReCell(®) device. However, despite its current clinical use, no characterisation of the cell suspension produced using a ReCell(®) device has been published.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the ReCell suspension that is applied to wounds for cell type, viability, yield, stability and proliferative potential.
METHODS: The ReCell(®) device was used to harvest cells from a 2 cm(2) piece of split-thickness skin isolated using a dermatome. The resulting cell suspension was analysed for cell yield, cell type, viability over time, proliferative potential and reproducibility.
RESULTS: Average viable cell yield was 1.7×10(6)/cm(2) of tissue, with 75.5% of the total cell isolate viable. Total viable cell number was not significantly reduced after 4 h storage at 22°C or 4°C, and was stable for 24 h at 4°C. Proliferative potential was assessed using a colony forming assay, with 0.3% of viable cells isolated forming keratinocyte colonies. Predominantly the suspension contained keratinocytes (64.3±28.8%) and fibroblasts (30.3±14.0%), with a small population of melanocytes also identified (3.5±0.5%). Finally, the supernatant contained low total protein (0.92 mg/ml) and the supernatant had no significant effects on cell viability or growth when applied ex vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the ReCell(®) device provides a method for the preparation of a cell suspension with high viability and proliferative potential, containing viable melanocytes and no apparent toxic cell debris. Further work on the sustained viability of these cells in vivo, and in particular after application to the wound, will be important to better understand the potential of the ReCell(®) device in the clinic. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079538     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  24 in total

1.  Randomized, Paired-Site Comparison of Autologous Engineered Skin Substitutes and Split-Thickness Skin Graft for Closure of Extensive, Full-Thickness Burns.

Authors:  Steven T Boyce; Peggy S Simpson; Mary T Rieman; Petra M Warner; Kevin P Yakuboff; J Kevin Bailey; Judith K Nelson; Laura A Fowler; Richard J Kagan
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cell Therapy for Burn Wound Healing: A Comparison of Two Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Philippe Foubert; Andreina D Gonzalez; Stephan Teodosescu; Felipe Berard; Melanie Doyle-Eisele; Krishna Yekkala; Mayer Tenenhaus; John K Fraser
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The clinical experience for treating post-burn depigmentation with tiny epidermal particles graft.

Authors:  Baoguo Chen; Minghuo Xu; Bingyuan Li
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  The Role of Skin Substitutes in Acute Burn and Reconstructive Burn Surgery: An Updated Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Alen Palackic; Robert P Duggan; Matthew S Campbell; Elliot Walters; Ludwik K Branski; Amina El Ayadi; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.195

5.  The use of a non cultured autologous cell suspension to repair chronic ulcers.

Authors:  B De Angelis; A Migner; L Lucarini; A Agovino; V Cervelli
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Skin cancers and dermal substitutes: Is it safe? Review of the literature and presentation of a 2-stage surgical protocol for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head in fragile patients.

Authors:  Marco Marcasciano; Marco Mazzocchi; Juste Kaciulyte; Noemi Spissu; Donato Casella; Diego Ribuffo; Luca Andrea Dessy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Evaluation and Management of the Burn Patient: A Case Study and Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Litt
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Indeterminate-Depth Burn Injury-Exploring the Uncertainty.

Authors:  Aos S Karim; Katherine Shaum; Angela L F Gibson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Abnormal pigmentation within cutaneous scars: A complication of wound healing.

Authors:  Sarah Chadwick; Rebecca Heath; Mamta Shah
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05

10.  Initial Experience Combining Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Autologous Skin Cell Suspension and Meshed Autografts.

Authors:  Bonnie C Carney; Laura S Johnson; Jeffrey W Shupp; Taryn E Travis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.