Objective: The use of noncultured autologous stromal vascular fraction or clinical grade adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) is a promising strategy to promote wound healing and tissue repair. Nevertheless, issues regarding the optimal mode of administration remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of local injection and topical spray delivery of ADRCs in a porcine model of thermal burns. Approach: Full-thickness thermal burns were created on the dorsum of 10 Gottingen minipigs. Two days following injury, wounds underwent fascial excision and were randomized to receive control vehicle or freshly isolated autologous ADRCs delivered by either multiple injections into or surrounding the wound bed, or by spray onto the wound surface (0.25 × 106 viable cells/cm2). Healing was evaluated by planimetry, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry at day 7, 12, 16, 21, and 28 posttreatment. Results: In vitro analysis demonstrated that there was no substantial loss of cell number or viability attributable to the spray procedure. Planimetric assessment revealed that delivery of ADRCs by either local injection or topical spray increased wound reepithelialization relative to control at day 14. No significant difference in wound reepithelialization was observed between both delivery approaches. In addition, on day 7 posttreatment, blood vessel density was greater in wounds receiving local or topical spray ADRCs than in the wounds treated with vehicle control. Histopathologic analysis suggests that ADRC treatment may modulate the inflammatory response by reducing neutrophil infiltration at day 7 and 12 posttreatment, irrespective of the route of administration. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that local injection and spray delivery of ADRCs modulate inflammation and improve wound angiogenesis and epithelialization. Importantly, both delivery routes exhibited similar effects on wound healing. Given the greater ease-of-use associated with topical spray delivery, these data support the use of a spray system for autologous ADRC delivery.
RCT Entities:
Objective: The use of noncultured autologous stromal vascular fraction or clinical grade adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) is a promising strategy to promote wound healing and tissue repair. Nevertheless, issues regarding the optimal mode of administration remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of local injection and topical spray delivery of ADRCs in a porcine model of thermal burns. Approach: Full-thickness thermal burns were created on the dorsum of 10 Gottingen minipigs. Two days following injury, wounds underwent fascial excision and were randomized to receive control vehicle or freshly isolated autologous ADRCs delivered by either multiple injections into or surrounding the wound bed, or by spray onto the wound surface (0.25 × 106 viable cells/cm2). Healing was evaluated by planimetry, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry at day 7, 12, 16, 21, and 28 posttreatment. Results: In vitro analysis demonstrated that there was no substantial loss of cell number or viability attributable to the spray procedure. Planimetric assessment revealed that delivery of ADRCs by either local injection or topical spray increased wound reepithelialization relative to control at day 14. No significant difference in wound reepithelialization was observed between both delivery approaches. In addition, on day 7 posttreatment, blood vessel density was greater in wounds receiving local or topical spray ADRCs than in the wounds treated with vehicle control. Histopathologic analysis suggests that ADRC treatment may modulate the inflammatory response by reducing neutrophil infiltration at day 7 and 12 posttreatment, irrespective of the route of administration. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that local injection and spray delivery of ADRCs modulate inflammation and improve wound angiogenesis and epithelialization. Importantly, both delivery routes exhibited similar effects on wound healing. Given the greater ease-of-use associated with topical spray delivery, these data support the use of a spray system for autologous ADRC delivery.
Authors: T G Ebrahimian; F Pouzoulet; C Squiban; V Buard; M André; B Cousin; P Gourmelon; M Benderitter; L Casteilla; R Tamarat Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Gerardo Marino; Marco Moraci; Emilia Armenia; Consiglia Orabona; Renato Sergio; Gabriele De Sena; Vincenza Capuozzo; Manlio Barbarisi; Francesco Rosso; Giovanni Giordano; Francesco Iovino; Alfonso Barbarisi Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Philippe Bourin; Bruce A Bunnell; Louis Casteilla; Massimo Dominici; Adam J Katz; Keith L March; Heinz Redl; J Peter Rubin; Kotaro Yoshimura; Jeffrey M Gimble Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: Andrea L DiCarlo; Radia Tamarat; Carmen I Rios; Marc Benderitter; Christine W Czarniecki; Theresa C Allio; Francesca Macchiarini; Bert W Maidment; Jean-Rene Jourdain Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Anastasia Shpichka; Denis Butnaru; Evgeny A Bezrukov; Roman B Sukhanov; Anthony Atala; Vitaliy Burdukovskii; Yuanyuan Zhang; Peter Timashev Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 6.832