| Literature DB >> 35706557 |
Alen Palackic1,2, Robert P Duggan1, Matthew S Campbell3, Elliot Walters1, Ludwik K Branski1, Amina El Ayadi1, Steven E Wolf1.
Abstract
Burns disrupt the protective skin barrier with consequent loss of cutaneous temperature regulation, infection prevention, evaporative losses, and other vital functions. Chronically, burns lead to scarring, contractures, pain, and impaired psychosocial well-being. Several skin substitutes are available and replace the skin and partially restore functional outcomes and improve cosmesis. We performed a literature review to update readers on biologic and synthetic skin substitutes to date applied in acute and reconstructive burn surgery. Improvement has been rapid in the development of skin substitutes in the last decade; however, no available skin substitute fulfills criteria as a perfect replacement for damaged skin. Thieme. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: biologics; burns; epithelization; skin; synthetic dressing; total body surface area
Year: 2022 PMID: 35706557 PMCID: PMC9192152 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Plast Surg ISSN: 1535-2188 Impact factor: 2.195