Literature DB >> 29863792

Skin cancers and dermal substitutes: Is it safe? Review of the literature and presentation of a 2-stage surgical protocol for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head in fragile patients.

Marco Marcasciano1, Marco Mazzocchi2, Juste Kaciulyte1, Noemi Spissu3, Donato Casella1, Diego Ribuffo1, Luca Andrea Dessy3.   

Abstract

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) represent the most common skin tumours of the head region. We describe the use of dermal substitute in a 2-stage surgery protocol for selected fragile patients to remove NMSC of the head region. A review of the literature focusing on dermal substitutes' safety after skin tumours excision is provided. A total of 45 fragile patients with NMSC in the head region were selected and scheduled for the 2-stage surgical protocol. The first stage consisted of traditional surgical excision and immediate coverage with Hyalomatrix (Fidia Advanced Biopolymers, Abano Terme, Italy). After histology confirmed diagnosis and clearance of the margins, full-thickness skin autografts were performed. All of the patients reached complete tumour excision and wound healing. No local recurrences were registered during 24 months follow up. The 2-stage surgical therapeutic-diagnostic-reconstructive approach represents a less stressful and oncologically safe surgical protocol in selected fragile patients. When patients cannot tolerate invasive and long surgical procedures, general anaesthesia, and long hospitalisation, skin grafting following temporary skin substitute coverage can achieve oncological clearance and provide good functional and aesthetic results. The use of dermal substitutes represents a valid alternative surgical option in cases of ASA III, fragile patients non-eligible for complex reconstructive surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first paper reviewing literature focusing on dermal substitutes' applications and safety after skin tumour excision.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dermal substitute; head region; non-melanoma skin cancer; review; skin graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29863792      PMCID: PMC7950193          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  78 in total

1.  The use of hyalomatrix PA in the treatment of extravasation affecting premature neonates.

Authors:  Maria G Onesti; Sara Carella; Michele Maruccia; Mariangela Ciotti; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Dermal substitutes do well on dura: comparison of split skin grafting+/-artificial dermis for reconstruction of full-thickness calvarial defects.

Authors:  R A J Wain; S H A Shah; K Senarath-Yapa; J K G Laitung
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Vacuum-assisted closure device and skin substitutes for complex Mohs defects.

Authors:  Teresa Cunningham; Malcolm Marks
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  A successful combined treatment with dermal substitutes and products of regenerative medicine in a patient affected by extravasation injury from hypertonic solution.

Authors:  Maria Giuseppina Onesti; Sara Carella; Michele Maruccia; Cinzia Marchese; Pasquale Fino; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Artificial dermis as an alternative for coverage of complex scalp defects following excision of malignant tumors.

Authors:  Ewa Komorowska-Timek; Allen Gabriel; Della C Bennett; Duncan Miles; Carlos Garberoglio; Chester Cheng; Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  [Use of Matriderm® 1mm in reconstructive surgery. Series of 31 cases].

Authors:  J Lamy; A Gourari; M Atlan; G Zakine
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 0.660

7.  Acellular human dermal matrix as a skin substitute for reconstruction of large periocular cutaneous defects.

Authors:  Flora Levin; Roger E Turbin; Paul D Langer
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  [The use of Integra dermal regeneration matrix in the surgical treatment of a recurrent, extensive, malignant skin lesion in the temporal region].

Authors:  Csaba Halmy; Zoltán Nádai; Krisztián Csőre; Adrienne Vajda; Róbert Tamás
Journal:  Orv Hetil       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 0.540

9.  Integra Artificial Skin for burn scar revision in adolescents and children.

Authors:  Dorothea Stiefel; Clemens Schiestl; Martin Meuli
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Nasal Tip Reconstruction Using Integra Bilayer Wound Matrix: An Alternative to the Forehead Flap.

Authors:  M A Applebaum; J D Daggett; W L Carter
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-12-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Rigenase® and Polyhexanide (Fitostimoline® Plus) vs. Hyaluronic Acid and Silver Sulfadiazine (Connettivina® Bio Plus) for the Treatment of Acute Skin Wounds: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Albino Carrizzo; Alfonso Barbato; Barbara Rosa Rasile; Paola Pentangelo; Alessandra Ceccaroni; Caterina Marra; Carmine Alfano; Luigi Losco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Skin cancers and dermal substitutes: Is it safe? Review of the literature and presentation of a 2-stage surgical protocol for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head in fragile patients.

Authors:  Marco Marcasciano; Marco Mazzocchi; Juste Kaciulyte; Noemi Spissu; Donato Casella; Diego Ribuffo; Luca Andrea Dessy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.