Literature DB >> 22078793

Simulation of a MR-PET protocol for staging of head-and-neck cancer including Dixon MR for attenuation correction.

Matthias Eiber1, Michael Souvatzoglou, Anja Pickhard, Denys J Loeffelbein, Andreas Knopf, Konstantin Holzapfel, Axel Martinez-Möller, Stephan G Nekolla, Elias Q Scherer, Markus Schwaiger, Ernst J Rummeny, Ambros J Beer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To simulate and optimize a MR protocol for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) patients for potential future use in an integrated whole-body MR-PET scanner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: On a clinical 3T scanner, which is the basis for a recently introduced fully integrated whole-body MR-PET, 20 patients with untreated HNSCC routinely staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT underwent a dedicated MR protocol for the neck. Moreover, a whole-body Dixon MR-sequence was applied, which is used for attenuation correction on a recently introduced hybrid MR-PET scanner. In a subset of patients volume-interpolated-breathhold (VIBE) T1w-sequences for lungs and liver were added. Total imaging time was analyzed for both groups. The quality of the delineation of the primary tumor (scale 0-3) and the presence or absence of lymph node metastases (scale 1-5) was evaluated for CT, MR, PET/CT and a combination of MR and PET to ensure that the MR-PET fusion does not cause a loss of diagnostic capability. PET was used to identify distant metastases. The PET dataset for simulated MR/PET was based on a segmentation of the CT data into 4 classes according to the approach of the Dixon MR-sequence for MR-PET. Standard of reference was histopathology in 19 cases. In one case no histopathological confirmation of a primary tumor could be achieved.
RESULTS: Mean imaging time was 35:17 min (range: 31:08-42:42 min) for the protocol including sequences for local staging and attenuation correction and 44:17 min (range: 35:44-54:58) for the extended protocol. Although not statistically significant a combination of MR and PET performed better in the delineation of the primary tumor (mean 2.20) compared to CT (mean 1.40), MR (1.95) and PET/CT (2.15) especially in patients with dental implants. PET/CT and combining MR and PET performed slightly better than CT and MR for the assessment of lymph node metastases. Two patients with distant metastases were only identified by PET.
CONCLUSION: We established a potential MR-protocol to be used for HNSCC patients in a recently introduced MR-PET scanner. The proposed protocol can be performed in an acceptable time frame and did not lead to a loss of diagnostic capability compared to PET/CT.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078793     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  15 in total

Review 1.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 3.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer's perspective.

Authors:  Antonis Kalemis; Bénédicte M A Delattre; Susanne Heinzer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Pieter Mollet; Yannick Berker; Volkmar Schulz; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.

Authors:  Jason Bini; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Jesus Mateo; Josef Machac; Jagat Narula; Valentin Fuster; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Qualitative and quantitative performance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S Partovi; A Kohan; J L Vercher-Conejero; C Rubbert; S Margevicius; M D Schluchter; C Gaeta; P Faulhaber; M R Robbin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Integrated whole-body PET/MRI with 18F-FDG, 18F-FDOPA, and 18F-FDA in paragangliomas in comparison with PET/CT: NIH first clinical experience with a single-injection, dual-modality imaging protocol.

Authors:  Elise M Blanchet; Corina Millo; Victoria Martucci; Roberto Maass-Moreno; David A Bluemke; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Region-specific associations between gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor binding and cortical thickness in high-functioning autistic adults.

Authors:  David James; Vicky T Lam; Booil Jo; Lawrence K Fung
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.633

10.  Generation of brain pseudo-CTs using an undersampled, single-acquisition UTE-mDixon pulse sequence and unsupervised clustering.

Authors:  Kuan-Hao Su; Lingzhi Hu; Christian Stehning; Michael Helle; Pengjiang Qian; Cheryl L Thompson; Gisele C Pereira; David W Jordan; Karin A Herrmann; Melanie Traughber; Raymond F Muzic; Bryan J Traughber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.