Literature DB >> 22078204

The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance.

Aileen M Gariepy1, Erica J Simon, Divya A Patel, Mitchell D Creinin, Eleanor B Schwarz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket expense on intrauterine device (IUD) utilization among women with private insurance. STUDY
DESIGN: We reviewed the records of all women with private insurance who requested an IUD for contraception from an urban academic gynecology practice from May 2007 through April 2008. For each patient, we determined the out-of-pocket expense that would be incurred and whether she ultimately had an IUD placed. The total charge for placement of a copper or levonorgestrel IUD (including the device) was $815.
RESULTS: Ninety-five women requested an IUD during the study period. The distribution of out-of-pocket expense was bimodal: less than $50 for 35 (37%) women and greater than $500 for 52 (55%) women. Intrauterine device insertion occurred in 24 (25%) women, 19 of whom had an out-of-pocket expense less than $50. In univariate and multivariable analysis, women with insurance coverage that resulted in less than $50 out-of-pocket expense for the IUD were more likely to have an IUD placed than women required to pay $50 or more (adjusted odds ratio=11.4, 95% confidence interval=3.6-36.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Women requesting an IUD for contraception are significantly more likely to have an IUD placed when out-of-pocket expense is less than $50.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078204      PMCID: PMC3217182          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  10 in total

1.  Update on the cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change.

Authors:  Debbie Postlethwaite; James Trussell; Anthony Zoolakis; Ruth Shabear; Diana Petitti
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; David Hubacher; Kathryn Kost; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell; Anjana M Lalla; Quan V Doan; Eileen Reyes; Lionel Pinto; Joseph Gricar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Daria P Rostovtseva; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs; Denis Hulett; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Economic analysis of contraceptives for women.

Authors:  Chiun Fang Chiou; James Trussell; Eileen Reyes; Kevin Knight; Joel Wallace; Jay Udani; Karen Oda; Jeff Borenstein
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.375

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Caitlin Canfield; Abigail R A Aiken; Amna Dermish; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  State Prescription Contraception Insurance Mandates: Effects on Unintended Births.

Authors:  Emily M Johnston; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Authors:  Caitlin Parks; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Effect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers.

Authors:  Christina Buckel; Ragini Maddipati; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Aileen M Gariepy; Jennifer Y Duffy; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; A Mark Fendrick; Nancy L Keating; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  How User Fees Influence Contraception in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Catherine Korachais; Elodie Macouillard; Bruno Meessen
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2016-11-17

9.  Changes in out-of-pocket costs for hormonal IUDs after implementation of the Affordable Care Act: an analysis of insurance benefit inquiries.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bearak; Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Amy Estlund; Anne Milne; Christina M Buckel; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.