Literature DB >> 21606745

Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Megan L Kavanaugh1, Jenna Jerman, David Hubacher, Kathryn Kost, Lawrence B Finer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics of U.S. women that are associated with use of long-acting reversible contraception and changes in these characteristics between 2002 and 2006-2008.
METHODS: We analyzed data from two nationally representative samples of women aged 15-44 in the National Survey of Family Growth, including 7,643 women in 2002 and 7,356 women in 2006-2008. We conducted simple and multinomial logistic regression analyses to identify demographic and reproductive health characteristics associated with use of long-acting reversible contraception.
RESULTS: Long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine devices and subdermal implants) use among U.S. women using contraception increased from 2.4% in 2002 to 5.6% in 2006-2008. The largest increases in long-acting reversible contraception use during this time occurred among the youngest and oldest age groups, non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic African American women, foreign-born women, and those in the highest income group. High prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use in 2006-2008 was seen among women who had given birth once or twice (10%), foreign-born women (8.8%), and Hispanic women (8.4%). After adjusting for key demographic and reproductive health characteristics, in comparison with users of other contraceptive methods and with those not using contraception who were at risk for unintended pregnancy, foreign-born women and women who experienced coitarche before age 18 were approximately twice as likely to be using long-acting reversible contraception as women without those characteristics.
CONCLUSION: A more diverse population of women used long-acting reversible contraception in 2006-2008 compared with 2002. However, there is likely more potential for increased uptake, especially among populations historically not considered to be candidates for these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606745     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c47c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance.

Authors:  Aileen M Gariepy; Erica J Simon; Divya A Patel; Mitchell D Creinin; Eleanor B Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population.

Authors:  DeShawn Taylor; Shannon Connolly; Sue Ann Ingles; Carey Watson; Penina Segall-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

4.  Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women Veterans in the ECUUN study.

Authors:  Angela F Koenig; Sonya Borrero; Xinhua Zhao; Lisa Callegari; Maria K Mor; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Long-acting Reversible Contraception Among Homeless Women Veterans With Chronic Health Conditions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lori M Gawron; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; Warren Pettey; David K Turok; Adi V Gundlapalli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Desire for Sterilization Reversal Among U.S. Females: Increasing Inequalities by Educational Level.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney; Lei Feng
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-10

7.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney; Jessica D Gipson
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-07-14

9.  Trends in contraceptive use among women with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Mengyang Sun; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tracey E Wilson; Kathleen M Weber; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Gypsyamber DʼSouza; Mary Young; D Heather Watts; Marla J Keller; Deborah Cohan; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices in Western region of The Gambia.

Authors:  Matthew Anyanwu; Bom Wekye Ndam Alida
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.